Wed May 21 09:34:12 UTC 2025: Here’s a summary and a news article based on the provided text:

**Summary:**

The Tamil Nadu government has petitioned the Supreme Court to transfer a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) from the Madras High Court. This PIL challenges the validity of state laws that remove the Governor’s power to appoint Vice-Chancellors of universities. The government argues that the case is connected to existing Supreme Court cases regarding the University Grants Commission’s regulations and that the PIL is politically motivated. They also request the High Court to defer the hearing until the transfer petition is decided.

**News Article:**

**Tamil Nadu Government Seeks Supreme Court Intervention in Governor Appointment Dispute**

**Chennai, Tamil Nadu – May 21, 2025** – The Tamil Nadu government has filed a petition in the Supreme Court seeking to transfer a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) currently before the Madras High Court. The PIL challenges the validity of state laws that strip the Governor of the power to appoint Vice-Chancellors of universities in Tamil Nadu.

During a hearing before a summer vacation bench of the Madras High Court, senior counsel P. Wilson, representing the Tamil Nadu Higher Education Department, stated the transfer petition was necessary due to the existence of related cases already under consideration by the Supreme Court.

Higher Education Secretary C. Samayamoorthy further argued that the PIL was politically motivated, identifying the petitioner, K. Venkatachalapathy, as a Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) office-bearer. The Secretary also pointed out that the core contention of the PIL – that the state laws contradict University Grants Commission (UGC) regulations – is already a central issue in ongoing Supreme Court litigations.

The state government contends that transferring the PIL to the Supreme Court for consolidation with existing cases is the most appropriate course of action. The government also informed the High Court that the Chief Justice of India had been orally requested to expedite the hearing of the transfer petition.

Furthermore, the Higher Education Secretary urged the Madras High Court to postpone the hearing on the PIL until the Supreme Court rules on the transfer request, arguing that there is no urgent need for the High Court to proceed during the summer vacation without allowing the state adequate time to prepare a comprehensive response.

Read More