Tue May 20 09:00:17 UTC 2025: ## Summary of Text:

The Chief Justice of India, BR Gavai, stated that laws passed by Parliament are presumed to be constitutional. Courts should only interfere if a clear and compelling case against the law’s constitutionality is presented. This statement was made to petitioners challenging the Waqf Amendment Act.

## News Article:

**Chief Justice Affirms Presumption of Constitutionality for Parliamentary Laws, Addresses Waqf Act Challengers**

**New Delhi:** Chief Justice of India (CJI) BR Gavai today reiterated the principle of the presumption of constitutionality for laws enacted by Parliament, cautioning petitioners challenging the Waqf Amendment Act that judicial interference is warranted only in cases where a glaring violation of the Constitution is evident.

Addressing the petitioners, CJI Gavai emphasized that laws duly passed by the legislature carry a significant presumption of being in accordance with the Constitution. He stressed that courts should exercise restraint and not intervene unless a demonstrably clear and compelling case is made out against the law’s validity.

The CJI’s comments come as the Supreme Court is hearing a petition challenging the Waqf Amendment Act, the details of which were not elaborated on in the statement. However, the CJI’s remarks highlight the high bar that challengers to legislation must clear in order to successfully argue against its constitutionality.

The court will continue to hear arguments regarding the Waqf Amendment Act, taking into consideration the CJI’s guidance on the presumption of constitutionality. The outcome of the case could have significant implications for the application of Waqf laws and the broader principle of judicial review in India.

Read More