Fri Sep 20 06:52:24 UTC 2024: ## IBM’s Definition of “Open” Draws Criticism
**SAN FRANCISCO, CA** – IBM’s recent pronouncements on “openness” have been met with skepticism and criticism, with some users questioning the company’s interpretation of the term.
According to Slashdot, a technology news site, commenters have pointed out that IBM’s definition of “open” appears to be limited to a degree of interoperability among some of their own equipment. One commenter, Harv Masterson, stated: “To IBM, ‘open’ means there is a modicum of interoperability among some of their equipment.”
This statement suggests that IBM’s definition of “openness” may not align with the broader understanding of the term, which typically implies the ability to access, modify, and distribute technology without restrictions.
The comments on Slashdot highlight a growing concern among users and developers about the lack of true openness in technology. This situation could lead to further fragmentation in the industry, making it harder for users to seamlessly integrate different products and services.
The Slashdot article underscores the importance of clear and transparent definitions of “open” in the technology industry, particularly when it comes to large companies like IBM.
First Piper 