Fri Sep 20 07:32:56 UTC 2024: ## IBM’s Definition of “Open” Raises Eyebrows
A recent discussion on Slashdot has brought to light the apparent discrepancy between IBM’s definition of “open” and the general understanding of the term. Commenter Harv Masterson observes that for IBM, “open” seems to equate to a limited level of interoperability between specific pieces of their equipment.
This revelation has sparked debate about whether IBM’s interpretation of “openness” aligns with the industry standard, which often implies a greater degree of compatibility and accessibility. The discussion highlights the potential for confusion and misinterpretation when companies employ terminology with different meanings. It remains to be seen whether IBM’s definition of “open” will be widely accepted or if it will lead to further ambiguity within the industry.
First Piper 