Mon Jun 23 23:20:00 UTC 2025: Okay, here’s a summary of the provided text and a rewritten version as a news article:

**Summary:**

A Foreign Policy article analyzes why former President Trump, despite campaigning on an anti-war platform and promising to be a peacemaker, has struggled to achieve lasting peace in Ukraine, Gaza, and particularly with Iran. The article argues that Trump’s real estate-oriented approach to negotiation, which favors quick, face-to-face deals, is ill-suited to the complexities of international diplomacy. Furthermore, his impatience, short timelines, and preference for coercive tactics create opportunities for those who oppose peace to undermine his efforts. The article highlights the pressure Trump faces from hawkish elements seeking military action, particularly against Iran, and suggests that his desire to appear tough can hinder diplomatic progress. While some limited successes have occurred, overall the lack of expertise and long term strategy has hindered the former president’s stated goals. It concludes that Trump could still achieve a diplomatic breakthrough, especially with Iran, but it would require a more patient and constructive approach.

**News Article:**

**Trump’s Peacemaking Efforts Hampered by Impatience, Experts Say**

**Washington D.C.** – Despite campaigning on a platform of ending wars and promising quick resolutions to global conflicts, former President Donald Trump’s efforts to broker peace in Ukraine, Gaza, and with Iran have been largely unsuccessful, according to a new analysis published in *Foreign Policy* magazine.

The article argues that Trump’s approach, characterized by an impatience for immediate results and a preference for coercive diplomacy, is ill-suited to the complexities of international negotiations. His background as a real estate developer, where quick deals are prioritized, clashes with the nuanced and often protracted nature of international diplomacy, according to author Emma Ashford.

“War is the pinnacle of human disagreement,” Ashford writes. “It occurs when states with irreconcilable differences choose to fight rather than talk it out. Often, the issues at stake are complex, requiring more than just a handshake and some hard bargaining.”

The analysis highlights Trump’s tendency to set short deadlines and use threats, which creates opportunities for those who oppose peace to sabotage negotiations. It also points to the influence of hawkish voices, particularly regarding Iran, who advocate for military action and undermine diplomatic efforts.

While the Trump administration has achieved some limited successes, such as bringing home hostages and initiating talks between Russia and Ukraine, the article suggests that a lack of expertise and strategic planning has hindered progress on more complex issues like Iran’s nuclear program.

“Trump could still be a peacemaker,” Ashford concludes, “But it would require the mercurial president, who is not normally known for his patience, to shift from ultimatum-based coercive diplomacy to a more constructive long-term approach.”

The analysis comes as negotiations between Iran and European diplomats are set to occur in Geneva, and as pressure mounts on Trump to take a more aggressive stance against Iran, especially given the ongoing hostilities in the Middle East.

Read More