Mon Jun 23 17:40:00 UTC 2025: Here’s a summary and a news article based on the text provided:
**Summary:**
Despite his past criticisms of foreign entanglements and promises to end “endless wars,” President Trump authorized U.S. strikes on three nuclear sites in Iran to support Israel in its ongoing conflict. This action has elicited a range of reactions from Trump supporters, primarily characterized by anxiety about the potential consequences and escalation of the conflict.
**News Article:**
**U.S. Strikes Iran Nuclear Sites, Sparking Anxiety Among Trump Supporters**
**WASHINGTON –** In a dramatic shift from his previous anti-war rhetoric, President Trump authorized strikes on three nuclear sites in Iran over the weekend, citing support for Israel amidst escalating tensions. The move, potentially ushering in a more dangerous phase of conflict in the region, has triggered a wave of emotions among Trump supporters, primarily dominated by uncertainty and anxiety regarding the future.
The action represents a stark contrast to Trump’s long-standing criticism of the Iraq War, his calls for troop withdrawal from Afghanistan, and his promise to end the “era of endless wars.”
“I agree with most people that war is bad,” said Bruce Bell, a Trump supporter who learned about the strikes via his phone Saturday night. “But I don’t know enough about this situation with Iran. I keep hearing about red lines and how they’ve been encroaching for a while.”
While some supporters expressed outright support for the President’s decision, many voiced concerns about the potential for wider conflict and the long-term implications of engaging in military action against Iran. The strikes raise critical questions about the trajectory of U.S. foreign policy and the future of the region.
First Piper 