Mon Dec 15 16:41:06 UTC 2025: Here’s a summary and a news article based on the provided text:
Summary:
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court is hearing arguments regarding whether the Subramaniya Swamy temple management should be allowed to light the Karthigai Deepam at the deepathoon (stone pillar) atop Thirupparankundram hill in Madurai. The core issue revolves around conflicting claims about the pillar’s origins and historical use. Arguments against lighting the deepam are based on the assertion that the pillar was established and used by Jains, not Hindus, and that lighting the deepam there would alter its nature. Those against lighting the deepam at the pillar also argue that if the Dargah is not able to set up facilities, neither should the temple management light the pillar. The court is also deliberating whether the petitioners should need to get a court order as the Dargah did.
News Article:
Madurai Court Weighs Religious Claims Over Ancient Pillar
Madurai, December 15, 2025 – A heated legal battle is unfolding in the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court over the lighting of the Karthigai Deepam at a stone pillar (deepathoon) located on Thirupparankundram hill. The case pits religious tradition against historical claims, sparking debate over the pillar’s true origins and its intended purpose.
The dispute centers around an appeal against a previous order that allowed the Subramaniya Swamy temple management to light the ceremonial lamp at the deepathoon. Opponents, including representatives of the Sikandar Badusha Dargah and the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, argue that the pillar is of Jain origin and not traditionally associated with Hindu rituals.
Senior Advocate T. Mohan, representing the Dargah, argued for parity, saying that since they had to go to civil court to assert their own custom (animal sacrifice) that petitioners should do the same to light the deepam at the pillar.
Senior Advocate N. Jothi presented historical arguments, stating that experts have noted the pillar’s connection to Digambara Jains who inhabited the area and used the pillar for lighting lamps during their gatherings. He cited similar Jain pillars in other locations, including Samanar Hills near Keelakuyilkudi and Shravanabelagola in Karnataka, as evidence. The counsel also insisted that the Karthigai Deepam has traditionally been lit at the Uchipillaiyar temple mandapam, not at the stone pillar.
The court is carefully considering arguments that allowing the lighting of the deepam at the pillar would effectively alter its historical and religious nature. The case has drawn significant attention due to the religious sensitivities involved and the historical significance of the site. The hearing is scheduled to continue tomorrow.
First Piper 