Mon Dec 15 15:18:00 UTC 2025: Here’s a summary and a rewritten news article based on the provided text:

Summary:

The Madras High Court has demanded an explanation from the Public Secretary for a significant delay in forwarding files related to the prosecution of two IAS officers involved in a ₹98.25 crore corporation contract irregularities case against former AIADMK Minister S.P. Velumani. Anti-corruption organization Arappor Iyakkam filed a contempt petition due to the years-long delay. The court expressed concern over the slow progress, emphasizing that anti-corruption measures must apply equally to all levels of government, including ministers, IAS officers, and judges, to maintain public trust.

News Article:

Madras High Court Demands Explanation for Delay in Velumani Case Prosecution

CHENNAI, December 15, 2025 (The Hindu) – The Madras High Court has expressed strong concern over the prolonged delay in the prosecution of two IAS officers implicated in a ₹98.25 crore corporation contract irregularities case involving former AIADMK Minister S.P. Velumani. Justice N. Anand Venkatesh has ordered the Public Secretary to provide an explanation for holding onto files seeking sanction to prosecute the officials from January 5, 2024, to August 30, 2025.

The order comes in response to a contempt petition filed by anti-corruption watchdog Arappor Iyakkam, citing years of delays in the prosecution process. The court also impleaded the Vigilance Commissioner and the Director of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, directing them to explain why they failed to follow up with the Public Department and ensure timely submission of the files to the central government for sanction.

Arappor Iyakkam’s counsel argued that the organization has been forced to repeatedly petition the court to prompt even basic investigative actions. The case revolves around alleged irregularities in contract awards within the Chennai and Coimbatore municipal corporations during Mr. Velumani’s tenure as Municipal Administration Minister (2014-2018). A First Information Report was registered in 2021, but the trial has yet to commence.

Justice Venkatesh questioned the Public Department’s “lethargic attitude,” highlighting the need for consistent application of anti-corruption laws across all levels of government. “The Prevention of Corruption Act cannot be confined to lower-level staff,” the judge stated, emphasizing that public faith in the system hinges on holding ministers, IAS officers, and judges accountable with equal vigor. The court has directed the respondents to respond by January 6, 2026.

Read More