Fri Dec 05 00:56:28 UTC 2025: Here’s a summary and a rewritten news article based on the text:

Summary:

A US appeals court has temporarily halted a lower court’s order requiring the Trump administration to withdraw National Guard troops from Washington, D.C. The stay allows the administration time to consider its response to the original ruling, which deemed the deployment illegal as it was not requested by city authorities and used for non-military purposes. The decision follows a shooting incident where two National Guard members were attacked, one fatally, prompting the administration to pledge an additional 500 troops.

News Article:

Appeals Court Pauses Troop Withdrawal Order in Washington, D.C.

Washington, D.C. – A US Court of Appeals has granted a stay on a lower court’s ruling that would have forced the Trump administration to withdraw National Guard troops from Washington, D.C. by December 11th, a deadline later extended by 21 days. The decision, handed down Thursday by a three-judge panel, provides the administration with time to formulate a response to the original order.

District Judge Jia Cobb initially ruled in November that the administration had acted unlawfully by deploying the National Guard for crime deterrence in the absence of a request from D.C.’s civil authorities. The deployment was part of President Trump’s broader initiative to combat crime and “beautify” the city, an effort that has faced legal challenges in other Democrat-led cities.

While the appeals court granted the stay, the judges stressed that the decision “should not be construed in any way as a ruling on the merits” of the case.

The decision comes in the wake of a shooting incident earlier this week that left one National Guard member dead and another critically injured. Following the attack, the Trump administration announced plans to deploy an additional 500 National Guard troops to the city.
Rahmanullah Lakanwal, 29, has been charged in connection with the shooting.

The ongoing legal battle highlights the conflict between the federal government and local authorities regarding the deployment of federal troops in the nation’s capital. The outcome of the case could have significant implications for future deployments and the extent of presidential authority in D.C.

Read More