Fri Nov 07 14:08:58 UTC 2025: Summary:

The National Board for Wildlife’s Standing Committee has approved 13 defense and paramilitary projects in high-altitude protected areas of Ladakh and Arunachal Pradesh. These projects, proposed by the Ministry of Defence, ITBP, and BRO, include border outposts, headquarters, storage facilities, training areas, and infrastructure works. While the committee acknowledged the projects’ importance for national security, they mandated strict environmental safeguards and mitigation plans to minimize ecological impact in the fragile Himalayan ecosystems. Projects approved include construction within the Eco-Sensitive Zone of the Eaglenest Wildlife Sanctuary and within wildlife sanctuaries in Ladakh like Changthang and Karakoram.

News Article:

NBWL Approves Defense Projects in Himalayan Protected Areas, Sparking Environmental Concerns

New Delhi, November 7, 2025 – The Standing Committee of the National Board for Wildlife (NBWL) has given the green light to 13 defense and paramilitary projects located within ecologically sensitive areas of Ladakh and Arunachal Pradesh. The decision, announced today, raises concerns about potential impacts on the region’s fragile Himalayan ecosystems and wildlife.

The approved projects, submitted by the Ministry of Defence, the Indo-Tibetan Border Police (ITBP), and the Border Roads Organisation (BRO), encompass a range of infrastructure development, including new border outposts, brigade headquarters, ammunition storage, training facilities, and road construction.

Among the more controversial approvals is the construction of a permanent bridge within the Eco-Sensitive Zone of the Eaglenest Wildlife Sanctuary in Arunachal Pradesh, a known biodiversity hotspot and elephant corridor.

In Ladakh, several significant defense installations have been approved within the Changthang Cold Desert and Karakoram (Nubra-Shayok) wildlife sanctuaries, including ammunition storage facilities and a high-altitude tactical training area.

While the NBWL acknowledges the critical importance of these projects for national security, the approvals come with strict environmental safeguards and mitigation plans aimed at minimizing ecological disturbance. These include construction restrictions, speed limits, and waste management protocols.

Ecologist R. Sukumar advised the committee to avoid construction near sensitive areas like marshes and riverbanks, which are vulnerable to flash floods and avalanches.

The decision is likely to fuel debate between proponents of national security and environmental conservation, highlighting the ongoing challenge of balancing development needs with the protection of India’s unique biodiversity.

Read More