
Wed Nov 05 19:34:44 UTC 2025: Okay, here’s a summary and a rewritten version of the text as a news article:
Summary:
The article from The Hindu discusses the Model Code of Conduct (MCC) in India, a set of guidelines meant to ensure fair elections. While the MCC is supposed to prevent the ruling party from using its power to influence voters with pre-election announcements of projects or grants, politicians often find ways to circumvent the rules, particularly regarding financial disbursements. The recent launch of the Mukhyamantri Mahila Rojgar Yojana (MMRY) in Bihar, where women are receiving grants just before the assembly elections, is cited as a prime example of violating the MCC’s spirit. The author argues that the MCC guidelines regarding new projects and financial grants are frequently ignored and should be scrapped, as they are more honored in the breach than in the observance.
News Article:
Bihar Cash Transfer Scheme Sparks Debate Over Election Conduct
Patna, November 6, 2025 – As Bihar heads to the polls, a state government scheme providing cash grants to women has ignited a controversy surrounding the Model Code of Conduct (MCC). Critics argue that the Mukhyamantri Mahila Rojgar Yojana (MMRY), launched just before the election schedule announcement, is a blatant attempt to influence voters.
Under the MMRY, women are eligible for ₹10,000 grants to promote self-employment. Disbursements commenced in late September, with weekly installments continuing until just before the first phase of voting on November 6th and a subsequent phase on November 11th.
While proponents highlight the scheme’s positive impact on underprivileged women, opposition parties and analysts question the timing, suggesting it undermines the MCC’s intent to ensure a level playing field.
“This is a clear violation of the spirit of the MCC,” said political commentator Ashok Sharma. “While technically, it may be argued as an ongoing scheme, the proximity to the election raises serious concerns about undue influence.”
The Election Commission of India (ECI) has faced scrutiny over perceived inaction regarding the scheme. Past attempts to legally enforce the MCC have been hampered by lengthy judicial processes.
Rangarajan R., a former IAS officer writing for The Hindu, argues that the MCC guidelines restricting new projects and grants before elections are consistently flouted and should be abolished. He suggests that focusing on violations related to campaign conduct, which the ECI can address under existing powers, would be more effective. The debate highlights ongoing challenges in maintaining fairness and transparency in the Indian electoral process.