Mon Sep 22 15:30:05 UTC 2025: Here’s a summary of the text, followed by a news article based on that information:
**Summary:**
The Kerala state government has formally rejected the University Grants Commission (UGC)’s proposed Learning Outcome-Based Curriculum Framework (LOCF). Higher Education Minister R. Bindu communicated the rejection in a letter citing concerns about academic depth, ideological bias, and infringement upon university autonomy. The state government commissioned an expert committee, which found the framework lacking and potentially divisive. They argue the LOCF promotes Western models through ideologically driven insertions, uses Indian Knowledge Systems in an outdated fashion, and undermines a critical, creative, and pluralistic higher education system. The state is urging the UGC to withdraw the draft and conduct a more inclusive and thorough review process, consulting with State governments, universities, and academic communities.
**News Article:**
**Kerala Rejects UGC’s Proposed National Curriculum Framework, Citing Ideological Concerns**
*THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, September 22, 2025* – The Kerala state government has formally rejected the University Grants Commission (UGC)’s proposed Learning Outcome-Based Curriculum Framework (LOCF), escalating concerns over the direction of higher education in India. In a strongly worded letter to Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan and UGC Chairperson Vineet Joshi, Kerala Higher Education Minister R. Bindu stated that the framework would not be implemented in the state in its current form, citing serious academic, structural, and ideological flaws.
The decision follows a comprehensive review conducted by a state-appointed expert committee, led by economist Prabhat Patnaik and Rajan Gurukkal. The committee’s findings highlight a lack of academic rigor and failure to reflect the country’s diverse social and educational realities within the UGC framework.
“The draft curriculum violates the autonomy of universities by prescribing syllabi, course structures and reading lists,” Minister Bindu wrote, asserting that the LOCF exceeds the UGC’s constitutional mandate.
The state government has raised particular concerns about the ideological underpinnings of the proposed curriculum. Minister Bindu alleged the inclusion of Western models through ideologically driven insertions and the use of divisive content under the guise of Indian Knowledge Systems. She described these elements as contributing to an outdated and academically unsound framework that could undermine a critical, creative, and pluralistic higher education system.
Kerala is urging the UGC to withdraw the current draft and undertake a fundamental review, emphasizing the importance of meaningful consultations with State governments, universities, and academic communities before finalizing any national-level curriculum. The expert committee’s report has also been forwarded to the Union Minister and UGC Chairperson for their consideration.
The rejection signals a potential clash between the central government’s vision for higher education and the priorities of some states, particularly those emphasizing academic freedom and localized curriculum development. The UGC has yet to respond to Kerala’s formal rejection.
First Piper 