Mon Sep 22 04:10:00 UTC 2025: Here’s a news article summarizing the provided text:
**Tirupati: TTD Board Member Accuses Former Chairman of Corruption Cover-Up**
**Tirupati, India** – A member of the Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams (TTD) board, Bhanu Prakash Reddy, has launched a scathing attack on former TTD Chairman Bhumana Karunakar Reddy, accusing him of enabling a cover-up in a major theft case involving a TTD employee named Ravi Kumar.
Speaking to reporters in Tirupati on Sunday, Bhanu Prakash Reddy questioned the alleged settlement made in the Ravi Kumar case, asking whether the actual amount involved was ₹40 crore or ₹400 crore. Ravi Kumar was allegedly involved in the theft of dollars from the temple’s treasury.
“Those who were supposed to protect the treasury became predators and made settlements with those who looted. Who gave you this right?” Bhanu Prakash Reddy stated, directly addressing Bhumana Karunakar Reddy.
He further criticized the decision to settle a case registered under Section 381 (theft by clerk or servant of property in possession of employer) through Lok Adalat, calling it a stain on the judicial system. He asserted that cases registered under Section 381 could not be simply settled.
Bhanu Prakash Reddy vowed to investigate all instances of alleged corruption and irregularities that occurred during the previous YSRCP government’s tenure at the TTD. He promised to expose the details of asset transfers related to the Ravi Kumar case, including the names of individuals involved. He demanded that Bhumana Karunakar Reddy explain why Ravi Kumar was allegedly kept in a special room and allowed to speak with high-ranking state officials and government leaders after the dollar theft was discovered.
In addition to the Ravi Kumar case, Bhanu Prakash Reddy also raised concerns about the allocation of medical shops within the Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences (SVIMS). He alleged that shops were awarded to individuals favored by the previous government without proper tendering processes, causing losses to the temple trust. He pointed out the discrepancy in tender amounts, noting that a person associated with YSRCP who previously secured a shop for ₹20,000 was now bidding in the lakhs.
First Piper 