
Sun Sep 07 06:26:57 UTC 2025: Here’s a summary of the provided text, followed by a rewritten version as a news article:
**Summary:**
The Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind (JUIH) issued a clarification denying that its president, Maulana Mahmood Asad Madani, had expressed support for dialogue with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) regarding the Gyanvapi and Mathura mosque disputes. JUIH claims a news agency misquoted Mr. Madani. While Madani appreciated any progress towards dialogue to improve relations, he emphasized that legal parties should decide on Gyanvapi and Mathura and operate within Sharia law. He highlighted a past settlement on Mathura. Politicians like Ashok Gehlot and Shahnawaz Hussain offered contrasting reactions, with Gehlot seeing dialogue as positive and Hussain suggesting JUIH was late to the table. Legal representation for the Hindu side in the disputes rejected settlement through dialogue. The article also notes recent statements by RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat regarding the disputes.
**News Article:**
**Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind Walks Back Reported Support for Dialogue on Mosque Disputes**
**New Delhi, September 7, 2025** – The Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind (JUIH) has issued a forceful clarification, denying earlier media reports that its president, Maulana Mahmood Asad Madani, endorsed dialogue with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) to resolve disputes surrounding the Gyanvapi and Mathura mosques.
The JUIH, in a statement released on Saturday, alleges that a news agency misquoted Mr. Madani, creating a “baseless and false” impression that he encouraged Hindus and Muslims to negotiate the mosque issues directly.
“Maulana Madani neither made any such statement during his entire interview nor was any question or response related to this issue raised,” the statement asserted.
The organization clarified that Mr. Madani had only expressed support for any efforts by RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat to foster dialogue and improve relations between the two communities, referencing a previous resolution from JUIH’s General Assembly advocating for mutual dialogue. The JUIH reiterated its invitation for the RSS chief to set aside differences and embrace one another.
Regarding the Gyanvapi and Mathura mosque controversies, JUIH stressed that any discussions are the prerogative of the legal parties involved and must remain within the bounds of Sharia law. The organization also highlighted a 1968 settlement reached in court regarding the Mathura issue, suggesting that no real dispute exists there.
The controversy followed comments made by RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat last month, suggesting that Muslims could resolve the disputes by relinquishing their claims to the Shahi Idgah in Mathura and the Gyanvapi mosque in Varanasi.
The reported initial comments from Mr. Madani drew mixed reactions. Congress leader Ashok Gehlot initially welcomed the possibility of dialogue, while BJP leader Shahnawaz Hussain suggested the JUIH was “late in initiating the dialogue” and should not have abandoned it earlier.
However, Advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain, representing the Hindu side in both cases, has firmly rejected the prospect of settling the matters through dialogue, expressing confidence in a legal victory. The situation remains tense, highlighting the complexities and sensitivities surrounding these ongoing disputes.