Fri May 16 14:13:15 UTC 2025: Here’s a summary and rewritten news article based on the provided text:
**Summary:**
The Delhi High Court has strongly criticized both Delhi and Uttar Pradesh Police for their inaction in the suspicious death of a 20-year-old college student, Harsh Kumar Sharma. Sharma was found dead in his car in Noida in December 2024, with suspicious items like a carbon monoxide cylinder, syringes, and a suicide note. Despite this, neither police force registered a First Information Report (FIR), leading to a failure to properly investigate the case. The court ordered the Delhi Police to register a “Zero FIR” and transfer the case to Uttar Pradesh Police, who must then register an FIR and conduct a thorough investigation. The court emphasized the need for police to register FIRs based on suspicious circumstances, rather than waiting for complete certainty or inquest reports.
**News Article:**
**Delhi High Court Slams Police Inaction in Student’s Suspicious Death**
**New Delhi, May 16, 2025** – The Delhi High Court has delivered a scathing rebuke to both the Delhi Police and the Uttar Pradesh Police for their failure to properly investigate the death of Harsh Kumar Sharma, a 20-year-old Delhi college student. Sharma was found dead in his car in Noida last December under suspicious circumstances, yet no FIR has been filed to date.
Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani called the case a prime example of police forces “passing the buck.” The court has now ordered the Delhi Police to immediately register a “Zero FIR” and transfer all evidence to the Uttar Pradesh Police within one week. The Uttar Pradesh Police is then instructed to register or re-register an FIR and commence a full investigation without further delay.
Sharma disappeared on December 3, 2024, after leaving his Delhi home for college in Noida. His body was later discovered in his car in Greater Noida. Inside the vehicle were a carbon monoxide cylinder, syringes, and a note implying a suicide.
The court expressed particular alarm that neither police force initiated a murder investigation despite the questionable circumstances. Vital forensic evidence, such as fingerprints and DNA, was not collected, and the car, a crucial source of potential clues, was returned to the family without proper examination.
The Delhi Police claimed they saw no reason to file an FIR, as the initial complaint did not indicate a cognizable offense. The Uttar Pradesh Police argued they could not assume the death was homicidal until an inquest report was completed.
Justice Bhambhani strongly rejected these arguments, asserting that the police had enough information to warrant an immediate FIR. The court cited a Supreme Court precedent confirming that inquest proceedings and FIR-based investigations can occur simultaneously. The court’s decisive action underscores the importance of prompt and thorough police investigation in cases of suspicious death.
First Piper 