Wed Jan 08 18:00:00 UTC 2025: ## Indiana Bill Could Dissolve Public School Districts, Replace Them with Charter Schools

**Indianapolis, IN** – A controversial bill proposed by Indiana Representative Jake Teshka would dissolve public school districts and replace them with charter school systems if over half of eligible students attend non-public schools. HB 1136 targets five districts, including Indianapolis Public Schools (IPS), impacting tens of thousands of students.

The bill mandates that districts where more than 50% of students are enrolled outside public schools by Fall 2024 must transition to a charter system by July 2028. This transition would involve dissolving the existing school corporation, eliminating elected school boards, and establishing unelected seven-member boards appointed by the governor, mayor, county fiscal body president, and the Indiana charter school board.

These new boards would be responsible for recruiting charter school operators to run the schools, possessing the same taxing authority as existing school corporations. Rep. Teshka argues the bill addresses situations where property taxes fund schools many residents don’t utilize. However, critics point out that property taxes also come from residents without children in schools.

The bill has drawn comparisons to failed school takeover attempts in other states, raising concerns about the potential for increased costs, charter school closures, and a lack of accountability to taxpayers. The reliance on privately-operated, publicly-funded charter schools, and the potential instability inherent in the charter school model, are significant points of contention. The success of the bill hinges on finding enough qualified charter operators willing to manage the often-challenging schools within these districts, and addressing the potential for increased tax burdens levied by an unelected body. The experience of New Orleans, which initially transitioned to an all-charter system after Hurricane Katrina but is now reverting to traditional public schools, offers a cautionary tale. The bill’s long-term implications for students and taxpayers remain a subject of intense debate.

Read More