![]()
Fri Sep 20 13:42:08 UTC 2024: ## DP World Tour Insists Ryder Cup Eligibility Not Influenced by LIV Appeal Delays
**LONDON** – The DP World Tour has insisted that the timing of appeals against fines imposed on players who competed in LIV Golf events is not being deliberately delayed to ensure their eligibility for the 2025 Ryder Cup.
Notable players like Jon Rahm, Tyrrell Hatton, and Adrian Meronk, who all appealed against the monetary sanctions for participating in the Saudi-backed breakaway series without permission, are currently allowed to play enough DP World Tour events this season to maintain their membership and remain eligible for the Ryder Cup.
However, speculation arose when two-time DP World Tour winner Eddie Pepperell suggested the appeal hearings might be deliberately postponed until after the Ryder Cup, conveniently benefiting all sides.
DP World Tour CEO Guy Kinnings addressed the concerns, stating that “there are those that may have said that to you,” but emphasized that the legal process is independent of the Ryder Cup timeline.
Kinnings clarified that the “legal process will dictate” the timing of the appeals, adding that “there’s one of two things: have the appeal and the decision gets made by the legal process, but in parallel with that there will be ongoing conversations about the future of the game which may or may not impact how things like the fines and that process gets handled.”
He also refuted suggestions that the delay is a tactic to buy time, stating, “That’s not the reason we’ve done it. We work within the rules of the legal process and there’s no strict, set formula for that.”
The appeals process for the LIV Golf players stems from their initial suspensions and fines imposed in June 2022. An arbitration panel subsequently ruled in favor of the DP World Tour in April 2023, upholding the Tour’s right to enforce its regulations.
The ongoing discussions surrounding the LIV Golf controversy continue, with the latest round of talks held last week in New York. These discussions have sparked controversy, especially given their proximity to the 23rd anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks.
Kinnings expressed regret for any offense caused by the timing, stating, “Unfortunately we didn’t set the time frame, didn’t set the agenda,” and offering apologies to those who felt upset by the timing of the discussions.