Thu Sep 19 07:19:28 UTC 2024: ## Thousands of Pagers and Walkie-Talkies Detonate in Lebanon, Killing 32

**Beirut, Lebanon** – A series of coordinated explosions involving thousands of pagers and walkie-talkies killed at least 32 people and injured over 3,100 in Lebanon on Tuesday and Wednesday. The attacks, widely believed to be orchestrated by Israel, have sparked global concern about the vulnerability of global supply chains and the potential for everyday communication devices to be weaponized.

The attacks have been attributed to Israel’s alleged booby-trapping of the devices with explosives. While Israel has not commented, Taiwanese company Gold Apollo, whose brand of pagers were used in the attacks, denied manufacturing the deadly devices, pointing to a Hungarian company called BAC as the licensee. The New York Times, citing intelligence sources, reported that BAC was an Israeli front set up to manufacture the explosive pagers.

Experts are expressing concern about the implications of these attacks. James Grimmelmann, a law professor at Cornell Tech, said, “Every company that makes or sells physical devices will be worrying about the integrity of their supply chain.” Brian Patrick Green, director of technology ethics at Santa Clara University, called the attacks a potential watershed moment for public trust in electronic devices, asking, “How widespread are these explosive devices? How did the explosives get into the devices or the device supply chains?”

Mariarosaria Taddeo, a professor of digital ethics at the University of Oxford, warned of a disturbing precedent, saying, “This scenario has been considered by experts but less so by state actors.” She argued for a public debate on supply chain control, digital asset autonomy, and digital sovereignty.

The attacks have prompted calls for increased security measures in the tech industry. Experts predict a “widespread reckoning” that will lead companies to tighten their supply chain security protocols. While larger companies like Apple and Samsung are considered less vulnerable due to their robust security measures, concerns remain about smaller suppliers and the potential for government cooperation in targeting individuals.

The incidents have also raised concerns about the potential for non-state actors to exploit supply chains and weaponize everyday devices. Experts warn that such tactics could be used by armed groups to create fear and advance their agendas.

The attacks have shaken global confidence in the security of personal electronics. As Andrew Maynard, a professor at Arizona State University, noted, “There are also a number of broader ramifications to the attacks. Before September 17, the idea of using personal devices to take out a well-defined group of people wasn’t part of the global zeitgeist. Now it is.”

Read More