Wed Sep 18 03:27:34 UTC 2024: ## Vice President Duterte Denies Misuse of Funds, Refuses to Take Oath at House Hearing

**Manila, Philippines** – Vice President Sara Duterte on Wednesday faced a House committee hearing regarding the Commission on Audit (COA) findings and the use of her office’s budget. Duterte categorically denied any misuse of public funds, stating that the Office of the Vice President (OVP) is “gladly responding” to any audit findings and will address any legitimate legal cases before the appropriate courts.

However, the Vice President refused to take an oath during the hearing, citing her status as a “resource person” rather than a witness. She emphasized the difference between the two roles, stating that taking an oath is only required of witnesses under House rules. This position was supported by former President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo and SAGIP party-list Representative Rodante Marcoleta, who argued that Duterte cannot be compelled to provide statements that could incriminate her, citing her constitutional right against self-incrimination.

During the hearing, which stemmed from a privilege speech by Manila Rep. Rolando Valeriano criticizing Duterte’s lack of cooperation, the Vice President accused the House of Representatives of pursuing a political agenda rather than genuine accountability. She claimed the inquiry was aimed at discrediting her and hindering her potential 2028 election bid, dismissing allegations of budget misuse as a mere pretext.

Duterte asserted that the OVP’s social programs have successfully reached 2 million beneficiaries, and despite the potential budget cut, the office can continue its operations next fiscal year. Following Duterte’s refusal to answer questions regarding her office’s budget, the House appropriations panel has recommended a P1.29 billion budget cut for the OVP’s proposed P2 billion budget for 2025.

This event marks the latest development in the ongoing tension between the Vice President and the House of Representatives, highlighting the political implications of the budget scrutiny and the broader discourse surrounding the 2028 elections.

Read More