Mon Sep 16 15:09:26 UTC 2024: ## UN Human Rights Council Resolution Risks Fueling Antisemitism, Critics Warn
**Geneva, Switzerland** – As the 57th session of the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) convenes in Geneva, a resolution aimed at combating racism is facing criticism for its omission of the recent Hamas massacre in Israel and the rise of antisemitism. The resolution, slated for a vote on October 9, is being dubbed the “Durban” resolution, a reference to the 2001 World Conference Against Racism (WCAR) in Durban, South Africa, which was marred by anti-Israel sentiment and the exclusion of antisemitism from the agenda.
Critics argue that the proposed resolution, by failing to acknowledge the October 7 massacre and the surge in antisemitic attacks that followed, perpetuates a disturbing trend of selective morality and reinforces a historical bias against Israel within the UNHRC.
“The glaring omission of antisemitism and the massacre of Israeli civilians is a grave concern,” stated Diana Krief, President of the Association Coopération and Development (ACD). “This resolution sends a dangerous message that Jewish lives are less worthy of recognition and protection.”
The exclusion of antisemitism, according to Andria Spindel, Executive Director of the Canadian Antisemitism Education Foundation (CAEF), is indicative of a broader strategy to isolate and delegitimize Israel by prioritizing certain political narratives over genuine human rights. “This selective approach is part of a larger effort to shape international opinion and policy against Israel,” Spindel explained.
The resolution’s focus on anti-apartheid and anti-colonial rhetoric, while neglecting the plight of Jewish communities, raises further concerns. Critics warn that this could justify labeling Israel as an apartheid state, a potent and morally charged narrative that could fuel further division and hatred.
“If this resolution passes without acknowledging antisemitism, it sets a dangerous precedent,” said Krief. “It could create an environment where antisemitism is tolerated and even sanctioned.”
The UNHRC’s history of passing resolutions condemning Israel more frequently than any other country, despite widespread human rights abuses elsewhere, further fuels the perception of bias and a lack of credibility.
The authors of the op-ed call for a comprehensive and balanced resolution that acknowledges all forms of hatred and discrimination, including antisemitism. They urge the UNHRC to amend the resolution to explicitly acknowledge the Hamas massacre and the increase in global antisemitism.
“The global community must oppose all forms of racism without exception,” Spindel concluded. “Anything less would undermine the very foundation upon which the UNHRC claims to stand.”
First Piper 