Thu Jan 08 15:30:20 UTC 2026: # Amaravati Land Pooling Scheme 2.0 Launched Amidst Political Wrangling

The Story:
On Thursday, January 8, 2026, Municipal Administration and Urban Development (MA&UD) Minister P. Narayana formally launched the Land Pooling Scheme-2.0 (LPS 2.0) at Pedamadduru village of Amaravati mandal in Palnadu district. This is the third village notified by the Andhra Pradesh Capital Region Development Authority (APCRDA) for LPS 2.0. Farmers have already begun submitting consent letters to offer their lands under the scheme, with 313 acres being committed within the first hour, accounting for nearly 30% of the total land being pooled at Pedamadduru.

Minister Narayana emphasized the farmers’ voluntary participation, attributing it to their trust in Chief Minister N. Chandrababu Naidu. He criticized the previous YSRCP government under former Chief Minister Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy for allegedly stalling development and harassing farmers, despite initially supporting the capital construction. He reassured the public that Amaravati would be developed in accordance with Green Tribunal permissions.

Key Points

  • Land Pooling Scheme 2.0 launched in Pedamadduru village, Amaravati, on January 8, 2026.
  • Minister P. Narayana launched the scheme and collected consent letters from farmers.
  • 313 acres of land were committed within an hour, representing approximately 30% of the total land to be pooled.
  • Minister Narayana credited Chief Minister N. Chandrababu Naidu for the farmers’ trust and willingness to participate.
  • He criticized the previous YSRCP government for allegedly obstructing Amaravati’s development.

Key Takeaways

  • The relaunch of the Land Pooling Scheme in Amaravati indicates a renewed focus on developing the capital city after a period of stagnation.
  • The strong initial response from farmers suggests a degree of confidence in the current government’s vision for Amaravati, as claimed by Minister Narayana.
  • The political rhetoric surrounding the launch highlights the ongoing contention between the current and previous administrations regarding the capital’s development.

    Read More