Mon Mar 09 16:02:04 UTC 2026: ### Karnataka High Court Refuses to Quash Sex Determination Case, Citing “Moral Blight”

The Story:

The High Court of Karnataka has refused to quash a criminal case against a radiologist and others involved in illegal sex determination, leading to the abortion of a female fetus. The case stems from an incident on August 22, 2025, where Channakeshava and his wife, Harshitha, allegedly sought to determine the sex of their unborn child, their third daughter. The court emphasized that female foeticide is not merely a legal offense but a moral and constitutional violation, highlighting the gravity of the situation.

The court’s decision underscores the seriousness with which it views such cases, citing the “chilling and interconnected chain of facts” leading to the loss of a nascent life. The complaint, lodged by the District Health and Family Welfare Officer, detailed how the couple, with the help of relatives Sardamma and Dase Gowda, and radiologist Dr. Shashi S.L., illegally determined the fetus’s sex, leading to its subsequent abortion.

Key Points:

  • The case revolves around an incident on August 22, 2025, involving Channakeshava and Harshitha, seeking to determine the sex of their unborn child.
  • Dr. Shashi S.L., a radiologist at a district hospital in Ramanagara, is accused of disclosing the sex of the fetus through coded communication.
  • The High Court refused to quash the case against Dr. Shashi, Sardamma, and Dase Gowda, emphasizing the severity of female foeticide.
  • Following the determination that the fetus was female, an abortion was performed, resulting in the fetus’s death.
  • The complaint alleges a systematic racket of sex determination, with Sardamma and Dase Gowda acting as agents.

Key Takeaways:

  • The Karnataka High Court is taking a firm stance against illegal sex determination practices.
  • The case highlights the persistent issue of gender discrimination and female foeticide in certain regions.
  • The judiciary recognizes the need to prevent individuals from exploiting medical expertise for illegal purposes.
  • The involvement of medical professionals in such practices underscores the ethical challenges within the healthcare system.
  • The case is a stark reminder of the societal pressures that lead to sex-selective abortions.

Impact Analysis:

This ruling is significant as it reinforces the legal framework against sex determination and sends a strong message to deter such practices. The court’s emphasis on the moral and constitutional implications of female foeticide is likely to influence future judgments and strengthen enforcement efforts. Furthermore, the case could prompt increased scrutiny of radiologists and other medical professionals to prevent their involvement in illegal sex determination rackets. The long-term impact could include a gradual shift in societal attitudes towards gender equality and a reduction in the prevalence of sex-selective abortions.

Read More

Related News: