Sat Feb 28 15:13:58 UTC 2026: ### Headline: Delhi Court Stays Bail of Youth Congress Leader in AI Summit Protest Case

The Story:
A Delhi sessions court stayed the bail granted to Indian Youth Congress (IYC) national president Uday Bhanu Chib on Saturday in connection with a protest at the AI Impact Summit on February 20. Chib was arrested on Tuesday and described by police as the “main conspirator and mastermind” behind the protest, where individuals allegedly removed jackets to reveal T-shirts with Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s picture and raised “anti-national” slogans. Duty Magistrate Vanshika Mehta initially granted bail, citing a lack of cogent reasons for further police custody and Chib’s deep roots in society, but police swiftly appealed and obtained a stay.

The defense claims they were not notified of the police’s motion to stay the bail order. Police allege that Chib failed to disclose the source of the T-shirts and incited a riot-like situation, assaulting police officers. Thirteen other Youth Congress members have also been arrested in connection with the incident.

Key Points:

  • Uday Bhanu Chib, IYC national president, was arrested in connection with a protest at the AI Impact Summit on February 20.
  • A magistrate court initially granted Chib bail but a sessions court stayed the order until March 6.
  • Police allege Chib is the “main conspirator and mastermind” behind the protest, which involved raising “anti-national” slogans.
  • The police claim the protest was pre-planned and coordinated.
  • The defense alleges they were not notified of the police’s motion to stay the bail order.
  • Thirteen other Youth Congress members have also been arrested.

Key Takeaways:

  • The swift reversal of the bail order suggests a strong interest by the prosecution in keeping Uday Bhanu Chib in custody.
  • The police are characterizing the protest as a serious threat, alleging pre-planning and intent to incite a riot.
  • The defense’s claim of not being notified about the stay hearing raises questions about procedural fairness.
  • The case highlights the tension between freedom of expression and potential threats to public order.
  • The incident underscores the heightened political sensitivity surrounding protests involving the Prime Minister.

    Read More