Tue Feb 24 13:02:25 UTC 2026: ### Gujarat High Court Addresses Deepfake Threat in PIL

The Story:
The Gujarat High Court has taken up a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) addressing the escalating misuse of artificial intelligence, specifically in the creation and distribution of deepfake videos and photographs. The PIL, filed by Advocate Vikas Vijay Nair, seeks legal reforms and regulatory actions against the use of AI to target “constitutional and statutory authorities” on digital platforms. The court has issued notices to state and central authorities, as well as major tech companies including Meta, Google, X, Reddit, and Scribd, and has scheduled the next hearing for March 20.

The petition emphasizes the potential of deepfake technology to damage reputations, erode public trust, and disrupt social harmony. It urges authorities to strengthen and effectively implement the existing Information Technology Act, 2000, and to consider amendments specifically addressing AI-generated deepfakes. Advocate General Kamal Trivedi acknowledged the severity of the issue, citing international examples of stringent laws regulating the misuse of AI.

Key Points:

  • A PIL has been filed in the Gujarat High Court concerning the misuse of AI in creating deepfake videos and photographs.
  • The PIL seeks legal reforms and regulatory actions to prevent the targeting of “constitutional and statutory authorities”.
  • Respondents include the state of Gujarat, the Gujarat Director General of Police, and tech giants such as Meta, Google, X, Reddit, and Scribd.
  • The court has issued notices to the respondents and scheduled a hearing for March 20.
  • The PIL highlights the potential for deepfakes to damage reputations, erode public trust, and disrupt social harmony.
  • The Advocate General acknowledged the severity of the issue and cited international precedents for regulation.

Key Takeaways:

  • The Gujarat High Court is taking the threat of deepfakes seriously, indicating a growing awareness of the potential for AI misuse.
  • The inclusion of major tech platforms as respondents highlights the expectation that these companies play a role in combating the spread of deepfakes.
  • The PIL reflects a concern that existing laws may be inadequate to address the challenges posed by rapidly evolving AI technology.
  • The Advocate General’s reference to international regulations suggests that the court may consider global approaches to addressing deepfake misuse.
  • The legal action is taking place within the broader context of court actions related to public interest, as evidenced by the Bombay and Punjab & Haryana High Court cases on February 24, 2026, indicating a growing trend of judicial intervention in matters of public concern.

Impact Analysis:

This case could have significant implications for the regulation of AI and the responsibility of tech platforms in combating deepfakes. A favorable ruling for the petitioners could lead to stricter enforcement of existing laws, the creation of new legislation specifically targeting deepfakes, and increased pressure on tech companies to proactively identify and remove manipulated content. This could set a precedent for other courts in India and potentially influence international efforts to regulate AI.

Read More