Tue Feb 24 11:59:14 UTC 2026: # Court Upholds ‘No Work, No Pay’ Principle in Haryana University Case
The Story: The Punjab and Haryana High Court has dismissed the plea of Bhag Singh Arya, a former research assistant at Haryana Agricultural University (HAU), who sought back wages for the period following his resignation in 1987. Arya resigned in protest against the government in 1986, following his participation in Janta Party protests. The court upheld the trial court’s decision, reinforcing the principle of “no work, no pay.”
Key Points:
- Bhag Singh Arya sought back wages after resigning from HAU due to political protests.
- Arya resigned in 1987 following his participation in 1986 Janta Party protests.
- The university argued that Arya did not work during the period in question.
- The court cited the legal principle of “no work, no pay.”
- The court criticized Arya for submitting conflicting letters, interpreting it as an ultimatum.
Key Takeaways:
- The “no work, no pay” principle remains a significant legal precedent in employment disputes.
- Resigning from a position due to political reasons does not guarantee back wages for the period of absence.
- The court scrutinizes the conduct of petitioners, particularly when conflicting information is presented.
- This case highlights the potential consequences of resigning from employment to participate in political protests.
- The decision reaffirms the university’s right to deny wages for periods when no work was performed.
First Piper 