Sat Feb 21 14:23:05 UTC 2026: Okay, let’s analyze these articles from the perspective of an investigative journalist and historical analyst, focusing on the critical reasoning behind the unfolding events.
Article 1: Trump’s Tariffs and the Supreme Court
- Key Events: The US Supreme Court strikes down President Trump’s global tariffs imposed under the IEEPA. Trump immediately responds by invoking Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 to impose new tariffs. India joins the Pax Silica alliance.
- Historical Context & Analysis:
- IEEPA’s Misuse: The article highlights that while IEEPA was intended for national emergencies involving foreign threats (like the Iran hostage crisis), Trump used it for trade disputes. This is a significant departure from precedent, indicating a willingness to stretch executive power.
- Echoes of Nixon: The article draws a parallel to Nixon’s 1971 tariff imposition during a balance-of-payments crisis. This suggests a historical pattern of US presidents using trade measures to address economic anxieties, though Trump’s approach is arguably more aggressive and less tied to traditional economic justifications.
- Trump’s Strategy: The fact that Trump had a contingency plan (Section 122) ready suggests he anticipated the Supreme Court challenge. This points to a calculated approach, prioritizing the imposition of tariffs regardless of legal obstacles. This shows Trump’s resolve towards his “America First” trade policies.
- Pax Silica and Geopolitics: India’s joining Pax Silica is crucial. It’s a clear alignment with the US in countering China’s dominance in critical technology supply chains (AI, semiconductors, minerals). This is a strategic move driven by concerns about economic coercion and supply chain vulnerabilities, and it fits into the broader trend of techno-nationalism.
- Critical Reasoning:
- Power Dynamics: The Supreme Court’s decision underscores the checks and balances in the US system, even under a strong executive. However, Trump’s immediate workaround demonstrates the executive’s capacity to adapt and exert influence.
- Economic Nationalism: The article reveals a growing trend of economic nationalism, where nations prioritize domestic industries and control strategic resources. This trend is fueled by anxieties about globalization, technological disruption, and geopolitical competition.
- India’s Calculus: India’s observer status on the Board of Peace and its participation in Pax Silica reflect a complex balancing act. India seeks to protect its interests (trade with the US, access to technology), but also maintains strategic autonomy and avoids alienating other global powers.
Article 2: Techno-Nationalism and the Future of Globalisation
- Key Events: Analysis of the economic roots of backlash against globalisation, with emphasis on the rise of techno-nationalism due to AI.
- Historical Context & Analysis:
- Theories of Anti-Globalisation: The article presents two theories for the backlash against globalisation: (1) distributional conflict (job losses, inequality) and (2) a structural transformation in capitalism due to AI.
- Shift in Capital-State Relationship: AI is reshaping the relationship between capital and the state. Frontier AI is capital-intensive and infrastructure-dependent, requiring state capacity. The state helps capital, and capital helps the state control its citizens.
- Erosion of Libertarian Utopianism: The article notes the fading of libertarian utopianism in the tech sector, with a rise in techno-nationalism comfortable with control, surveillance, and strategic rivalry.
- Critical Reasoning:
- Techno-Nationalism as a Threat to Globalisation: The rise of techno-nationalism challenges the traditional model of globalisation. This has implications for international trade, investment, and cooperation.
First Piper 