Wed Feb 11 03:29:12 UTC 2026: Headline: Ghislaine Maxwell Invokes Fifth Amendment During House Committee Deposition
The Story:
Ghislaine Maxwell, serving a 20-year prison sentence for her role in facilitating Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse of underage girls, invoked the Fifth Amendment during a deposition before the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. The move drew immediate criticism, as it prevented the committee from questioning her about Epstein’s activities. Maxwell’s lawyer, David Markus, stated he advised her to invoke the Fifth Amendment due to her ongoing habeas corpus petition.
Key Points:
* Ghislaine Maxwell, convicted in December 2021, invoked her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.
* The Fifth Amendment protects individuals from being compelled to testify against themselves.
* David Markus, Maxwell’s lawyer, cited her ongoing habeas corpus petition as the reason for invoking the Fifth Amendment.
* House Oversight Committee members, led by Republican Chairman Rep. James Comer, expressed frustration that Maxwell’s silence curtailed a “unique opportunity” to learn about Epstein’s activities.
* Rep. James Comer is facing increasing pressure to get answers in this investigation.
Critical Analysis:
The timing of Maxwell’s deposition, coupled with the recent release of Epstein-related documents and surveillance footage, suggests a heightened atmosphere of scrutiny and potential revelations. The pressure on Rep. Comer to enforce subpoenas against high-profile figures like former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton further underscores the high stakes of this investigation. Maxwell’s decision to remain silent is a strategic move, potentially aimed at protecting herself from further legal repercussions or avoiding implicating others.
Key Takeaways:
- Maxwell’s invocation of the Fifth Amendment has effectively halted, at least for now, any direct testimony she might have provided regarding Epstein’s activities.
- This development underscores the ongoing legal and political fallout from the Epstein case.
- The pressure on the House Oversight Committee to uncover more information remains significant.
- Maxwell’s legal strategy is clearly focused on mitigating her own potential liability.
Impact Analysis:
The long-term impact of Maxwell’s silence is potentially significant. It may shield certain individuals from further scrutiny and hinder the full exposure of Epstein’s network. While it might offer Maxwell some legal protection, it also perpetuates the sense of opacity surrounding the case, denying victims and the public closure and complete transparency. The investigation will likely continue, but Maxwell’s silence presents a considerable obstacle to uncovering all relevant facts.
First Piper 