Fri Feb 06 17:12:34 UTC 2026: ### Actor Jayaram Summoned in Sabarimala Gold Theft Case
The Story:
The Enforcement Directorate has summoned popular actor Jayaram for questioning in connection with the Sabarimala gold theft case-linked money laundering investigation. The agency is also in the process of summoning Unnikrishnan Potti, the alleged prime accused in the case, who was recently released on bail. Jayaram had previously been questioned by a special investigation team (SIT) regarding his relationship with Mr. Potti, stemming from a video showing them performing puja together.
Key Points:
- The Enforcement Directorate has summoned actor Jayaram for questioning.
- The questioning is related to the Sabarimala gold theft case-linked money laundering investigation.
- Unnikrishnan Potti, the alleged prime accused, is also being summoned.
- Mr. Potti recently obtained bail from a Kollam court.
- Jayaram was previously questioned by an SIT about a video showing him and Mr. Potti performing puja together.
- Jayaram has denied any wrongdoing and links to the company involved in replating gold artifacts at the temple.
Key Takeaways:
- The Sabarimala gold theft case continues to be a significant investigation with potential high-profile implications.
- The Enforcement Directorate’s involvement suggests a focus on the financial aspects of the case, specifically potential money laundering.
- The summoning of a well-known actor like Jayaram highlights the broad scope of the investigation.
- Public figures are under increased scrutiny for potential links to criminal activities.
Impact Analysis:
The investigation into the Sabarimala gold theft case could have far-reaching implications for the temple administration and potentially other individuals or entities involved in managing temple assets. The entanglement of a popular actor like Jayaram could significantly affect his public image and career, regardless of the investigation’s outcome. The case may lead to stricter regulations and oversight of religious institutions’ financial dealings to prevent future incidents of theft and money laundering. The outcome of the case will likely influence public perception of transparency and accountability in religious institutions.