Thu Feb 05 06:54:59 UTC 2026: ### Headline: CBI Investigation Reveals No Theft in Sivaganga Custodial Death Case, Judge Expresses Anguish

The Story

In a significant development in the Sivaganga illegal custodial killing case of B. Ajith Kumar, a 29-year-old temple security guard, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) informed the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court on Wednesday, February 4, 2026, that the alleged theft of jewelry, which served as the basis for the victim’s detention, has been closed due to lack of evidence. Justice S. Srimathy expressed deep concern, questioning the validity of the entire case against Ajith Kumar and directing the CBI to submit a report regarding potential action against the complainant, Nikitha.

The CBI confirmed that a charge sheet and supplementary charge sheet had been filed against 10 police personnel accused in the custodial death before the Fifth Additional District and Sessions Court in Madurai, emphasizing that it was a case of police excess. The court adjourned the hearing on the bail petitions filed by the accused.

Key Points

  • The CBI closed the alleged jewelry theft case due to a lack of evidence.
  • Justice S. Srimathy expressed anguish that a person was beaten to death in a case with no basis.
  • The Judge requested a report from the CBI on potential action against the complainant, Nikitha.
  • A charge sheet and supplementary charge sheet have been filed against 10 police personnel for alleged police excess in the death of B. Ajith Kumar.
  • B. Ajith Kumar was a temporary security employee at the Badrakali Amman Temple in Madapuram, Sivaganga district.
  • Nikitha alleged that gold ornaments were missing from her bag after Ajith Kumar parked her car on June 27, 2025.
  • Ajith Kumar died on June 28, 2025 during interrogation.

Key Takeaways

  • The CBI’s closure of the theft case significantly undermines the justification for Ajith Kumar‘s detention and subsequent death.
  • The judiciary is taking a strong stance against potential abuse of power and custodial violence.
  • The case highlights the importance of thorough investigation and due process in criminal proceedings.
  • Accountability is being sought not only from the police personnel directly involved but also from the complainant whose allegations initiated the chain of events.
  • The incident underscores the vulnerability of individuals in custody and the need for greater oversight of police procedures.

    Read More

Related News: