Thu Feb 05 11:24:06 UTC 2026: ### Headline: Congress Condemns PM’s Accusations, Alleges Shielding Behind Speaker
The Story
During the Parliament Budget Session on February 5, 2026, a heated exchange erupted between the Congress party and the Prime Minister. The Prime Minister launched a scathing attack on the Congress, criticizing their alleged lack of vision and plans. The Prime Minister also alluded to the Bofors scandal while criticizing the Congress’s criticism of a US pact, stating, “Under Them, Deals Meant Bofors”. In response, the Congress vehemently rejected the accusations and accused the Prime Minister of hiding behind the Speaker of the House.
Key Points
- The Prime Minister attacked the Congress party during the Parliament Budget Session.
- The Prime Minister accused Congress of having “no ideas, no vision, no plan.”
- The Prime Minister referenced the Bofors scandal in his criticism.
- The Congress party refuted the charges.
- The Congress party accused the Prime Minister of hiding behind the Speaker.
Critical Analysis
The Prime Minister’s attack, particularly the reference to the Bofors scandal, suggests a deliberate strategy to undermine the Congress party’s credibility by reminding the public of past controversies. The Congress’s response, accusing the Prime Minister of hiding behind the Speaker, indicates an attempt to portray the Prime Minister as avoiding direct accountability and using parliamentary procedure as a shield. This reveals an escalation of political rhetoric and a deepening divide between the ruling party and the opposition.
Key Takeaways
- Political rhetoric is intensifying as evidenced by the direct and accusatory nature of statements from both sides.
- Historical scandals continue to be used as ammunition in contemporary political battles.
- The relationship between the ruling party and the opposition is increasingly adversarial.
- The Parliament Budget Session is becoming a platform for political point-scoring, potentially hindering substantive policy debates.
Impact Analysis
The heightened political tension is likely to further polarize the electorate and make bipartisan cooperation more difficult. The use of historical scandals as political weapons could also contribute to public cynicism and distrust in political institutions. The effectiveness of parliamentary proceedings may be compromised if the focus shifts from policy to political attacks.
First Piper 