Mon Feb 02 15:30:00 UTC 2026: # Mary Kom Issues Apology Amidst Divorce Controversy

The Story

Indian boxing legend Mary Kom has issued a public apology following a wave of criticism related to comments she made regarding her divorce and her ex-husband’s career. The controversy stemmed from an interview where Kom allegedly disparaged her former husband and made remarks that were perceived as belittling to football players and men who support their wives’ careers. Facing significant backlash and accusations of demeaning men, Kom released a video clarifying her statements and expressing regret for any offense caused.

The dispute began after Mary Kom and Karung Onkholer Kom announced their divorce in April 2025. Following the announcement, both parties engaged in public accusations. Karung stated he sacrificed his football career for her, and Mary Kom retorted he earned no income and depended on her. Karung responded with allegations of infidelity.

Key Points

  • Mary Kom issued an apology for comments perceived as demeaning to football players and men.
  • The apology follows public criticism related to her divorce from Karung Onkholer Kom announced in April 2025.
  • Karung claimed he sacrificed his football career for her boxing career.
  • Mary Kom accused Karung of being financially dependent.
  • Karung responded by accusing Mary Kom of infidelity.
  • Mary Kom denied intending to disrespect any sports or athletes and attributed her remarks to emotional distress.
  • Mary Kom stated she always behaved with dignity, and the words had been twisted on social media.
  • Mary Kom stated the comments were not aimed to undermine men.

Key Takeaways

  • Public figures face heightened scrutiny for their personal lives and comments.
  • Divorce proceedings can lead to public disputes and reputation damage.
  • Perceptions of gender roles and career sacrifices remain sensitive topics.
  • Social media can amplify controversies and distort the meaning of statements.
  • Public apologies are sometimes necessary to mitigate reputational harm.

    Read More