Thu Jan 29 04:58:46 UTC 2026: # Delhi High Court Addresses Ban on Frozen Embryo Adoption

The Story

On January 28, 2026, the Delhi High Court issued a notice to the Central Government, seeking its position on a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) that challenges the existing blanket ban on the adoption of frozen embryos in India. The PIL, filed by IVF specialist Dr. Aniruddha Narayan Malpani, argues that the ban violates fundamental rights enshrined in the Constitution. The court, consisting of Chief Justice D. K. Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia, has agreed to hear the matter further in April.

The petition contends that prohibiting embryo adoption, even when altruistic and consensual, creates an unequal and discriminatory treatment of infertile couples. It asserts that this ban, as outlined in the Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act, 2021, is arbitrary and infringes upon the right to make reproductive choices, a right considered integral to life, dignity, autonomy, and privacy under Article 21 of the Constitution.

Key Points

  • The Delhi High Court issued a notice to the Central Government regarding a PIL challenging the ban on frozen embryo adoption.
  • The PIL was filed by IVF specialist Dr. Aniruddha Narayan Malpani.
  • The PIL challenges Sections 25(2), 27(5), 28(2), and 29 of the Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act, 2021, and Rule 13(1)(a) of the Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Rules.
  • The petition argues that the ban creates unequal treatment between similarly placed infertile couples and violates Article 14 of the Constitution.
  • The next hearing is scheduled for April.

Key Takeaways

  • The Delhi High Court is actively examining the legality and constitutionality of the ban on frozen embryo adoption.
  • The case highlights the ongoing debate about reproductive rights and the legal definition of family formation in India.
  • The outcome of the case could significantly impact infertile couples seeking alternative methods of family building.
  • The petition hinges on the argument that embryo adoption is conceptually similar to child adoption, warranting similar legal treatment.

Impact Analysis

The Delhi High Court’s decision will have far-reaching implications for reproductive rights in India. A ruling in favor of the PIL could legalize embryo adoption, providing infertile couples with another pathway to parenthood. Conversely, upholding the ban could reinforce existing restrictions and potentially lead to further legal challenges regarding the scope of reproductive autonomy. The case will likely set a precedent for future legal interpretations of the Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act, 2021, and its impact on individuals’ reproductive choices.

Read More

Related News: