Sun Jan 25 06:10:00 UTC 2026: # Controversy Swirls Around Pimblett vs. Gaethje Interim Title Fight at UFC 324

The Story: The upcoming UFC 324 headliner between Paddy “The Baddy” Pimblett and Justin Gaethje for the interim lightweight title is generating significant controversy, with figures like Arman Tsarukyan and Matt Brown openly criticizing the matchup. Tsarukyan believes Pimblett isn’t adequately promoting the fight and considers it undeserving of a main event slot, especially with the new billion-dollar Paramount+ streaming deal on the line. Brown echoes this sentiment, labeling the fight “garbage” and an example of the UFC prioritizing entertainment over genuine sporting competition.

Key Points:

  • UFC 324 is scheduled for Saturday, January 24, 2026, at T-Mobile Arena in Las Vegas.
  • Paddy Pimblett is facing Justin Gaethje for the interim lightweight title.
  • Arman Tsarukyan, the No. 1-ranked lightweight contender, criticizes Pimblett’s lack of promotion and calls the fight “garbage.”
  • Matt Brown, former UFC welterweight, believes the fight is not worthy of a main event slot and exemplifies the UFC’s shift towards entertainment over sport.
  • Tsarukyan’s own issues with conduct, including altercations with fans and missed events, are cited as potential reasons for his exclusion from headlining events.

Key Takeaways:

  • The UFC’s decision to have Pimblett vs. Gaethje headline UFC 324 is being heavily scrutinized.
  • Concerns are being raised about the integrity of the UFC rankings and matchmaking process.
  • The event showcases the growing tension between prioritizing marketable fighters like Pimblett versus rewarding fighters based purely on merit and ranking, as seen with Tsarukyan.
  • The success of UFC 324 and the Paramount+ streaming deal is potentially impacted by the negative perception surrounding the main event.
  • Arman Tsarukyan’s own behavior may be hindering his opportunities for bigger fights, despite his high ranking.

Impact Analysis:

The controversy surrounding UFC 324 could have several long-term implications:

  • Damage to UFC Credibility: The perception of prioritizing entertainment over sport could erode the UFC’s credibility among purist fans and analysts.
  • Fighter Dissatisfaction: Fighters like Tsarukyan may become increasingly vocal about perceived unfairness, potentially leading to contract disputes or fighters seeking opportunities in other organizations.
  • Shifting Fan Base: The UFC could continue to attract more casual fans interested in entertainment, potentially alienating long-time fans focused on the sport’s competitive integrity.
  • Future Matchmaking: This situation could force the UFC to re-evaluate its matchmaking process and consider the balance between entertainment value and sporting merit when determining main event fights. The success or failure of UFC 324’s viewership numbers could be a key data point in that evaluation.

    Read More