Sat Jan 24 01:41:17 UTC 2026: ### Headline: UK Prime Minister Demands Apology After Trump’s NATO Remarks Spark Outrage
The Story:
U.S. President Donald Trump has ignited a diplomatic firestorm with comments made in an interview with Fox News at Davos, Switzerland on January 22, 2026, questioning NATO’s willingness to support the United States. Specifically, Trump asserted that non-U.S. NATO troops in Afghanistan “stayed a little back, a little off the front lines,” implying a lack of commitment. These remarks have drawn condemnation across the United Kingdom, with Prime Minister Keir Starmer labeling them “insulting” and “appalling,” demanding an apology from the U.S. President.
The controversy arrives as NATO’s mutual-defence mandate has been triggered for the first time after the attacks on New York and Washington. The UK reaction was raw, with Keir Starmer paid tribute to the 457 British personnel who died and to those have been left with profound life-long injuries. Prince Harry also weighed in, emphasizing that the sacrifices of British soldiers “deserve to be spoken about truthfully and with respect.”
Key Points:
- President Donald Trump questioned the commitment of non-U.S. NATO troops during the Afghanistan war.
- British Prime Minister Keir Starmer described Trump’s remarks as “insulting” and “appalling,” calling for an apology.
- The comments have provoked outrage and distress across the United Kingdom.
- Prince Harry emphasized that the sacrifices of British soldiers deserve respect and truthfulness.
- Over 150,000 British troops served in Afghanistan, the largest contingent after the American one, with 457 British personnel who died and to those have been left with profound life-long injuries.
- The UK had withdrawn from Afghanistan in 2014.
Key Takeaways:
- President Trump’s comments risk straining relations between the United States and key NATO ally, the United Kingdom.
- The remarks are particularly sensitive given the sacrifices made by British troops in Afghanistan, where over 150,000 troops were deployed.
- The controversy highlights ongoing tensions surrounding burden-sharing within NATO and questions of military contribution.