Sat Jan 24 16:21:36 UTC 2026: # Mangaluru Police Crackdown on Sureties for Absconding Accused

The Story:

Police Commissioner Sudheer Kumar Reddy of Mangaluru has issued a stern warning to individuals providing surety for accused persons in serious criminal cases. The warning comes in response to 38 notorious crime accused who have remained at large for several years after securing bail. The city police have initiated action against those who stood as sureties, threatening property attachment and forfeiture of surety amounts if the accused fail to appear in court.

Key Points:

  • Police Commissioner Reddy warns of consequences for sureties of absconding accused.
  • 38 individuals accused of serious crimes have remained at large after obtaining bail.
  • The police will forfeit surety amounts if the accused fail to appear in court.
  • Properties of those who provided surety will be attached.
  • The individuals who gave surety will face difficulty to transact using that property.

Critical Analysis:

The news article explicitly mentions the police action against the sureties. The historical context also mentioned the same point – Mangaluru police attaching properties of sureties. This indicates a concerted effort and policy shift by the Mangaluru police department to hold sureties accountable, likely due to the rising problem of accused absconding after bail. The high number of absconding accused (38) suggests a systemic weakness in the bail system, which the police are attempting to address by increasing the risk for those who provide surety.

Key Takeaways:

  • The Mangaluru police are taking a proactive stance in holding sureties accountable for ensuring the appearance of accused individuals in court.
  • The large number of absconding accused highlights potential issues within the bail system.
  • This action aims to deter individuals from providing surety without due diligence, potentially improving the rate of accused appearing in court.
  • The attachment of property is a significant deterrent, as it affects the sureties’ ability to transact and manage their assets.

Impact Analysis:

This crackdown could have several long-term implications. Firstly, it may lead to a decrease in the number of individuals willing to act as sureties, particularly for those accused of serious crimes. Secondly, it may force courts to re-evaluate the criteria for granting bail, potentially leading to stricter conditions or higher bail amounts. Finally, it could improve the efficiency of the judicial process by ensuring that more accused individuals are present for trial, reducing delays and backlogs.

Read More

Related News: