
Sun Jan 18 15:03:34 UTC 2026: # Karnataka Scheduled Tribes Demand Internal Reservation Amidst Caste-Based Quota Debate
The Story:
On January 18, 2026, the Dakshina Kannada and Udupi District Scheduled Tribe Ola Meesalati Horata Samiti demanded that the Karnataka State Government implement internal reservations for Scheduled Tribes (STs), similar to those already in place for Scheduled Castes (SCs). Addressing the press in Mangaluru, MLC Shantaram Siddi, a member of the Samiti, emphasized that the government should extend the benefits of reservation equitably to all ST communities, mirroring the model implemented following the recommendations of the Justice Nagamohan Das Committee for SCs.
Key Points:
- The demand was made by the Dakshina Kannada and Udupi District Scheduled Tribe Ola Meesalati Horata Samiti on January 18, 2026.
- Shantaram Siddi highlighted the disparity in population among the 50 Scheduled Tribes in Karnataka.
- According to the 2011 census, the Valmiki tribe constitutes 32.96 lakh of the total 42.48 lakh ST population, leaving only 9.52 lakh individuals spread across the remaining 49 tribes.
- The Samiti aims to ensure that smaller and Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups (PVTGs) like Koraga, Jenu Kuruba, Yerava, Soliga, Siddi, Medara, Marati Nayaka, and Halasa receive adequate representation and benefits from the reservation policy.
- The Samiti has stated they will legally pursue their demands for internal reservation among STs.
Critical Analysis:
The demand for internal reservations for Scheduled Tribes in Karnataka is contextualized by ongoing debates about equitable distribution of resources and opportunities among marginalized communities. The reference to the Justice Nagamohan Das Committee recommendations for SCs highlights a precedent for such internal categorizations. The context also shows an environment of tribal issues across India, most notably in Manipur where displaced tribals are seeking accountability. This signals a potential for increased focus and activism concerning tribal rights and welfare across the country.
Key Takeaways:
- The unequal distribution of population and consequently, benefits of reservation amongst different ST communities in Karnataka is a significant driver for this demand.
- The Samiti is leveraging existing legal frameworks and precedents (internal reservation for SCs) to strengthen their case.
- The focus on PVTGs suggests an understanding of the unique vulnerabilities and needs of the smaller tribal groups.
- The pursuit of legal recourse indicates a strategic approach towards achieving their demands.
Impact Analysis:
The implementation of internal reservations for STs in Karnataka could set a precedent for other states with diverse tribal populations. This could lead to a nationwide re-evaluation of reservation policies and a potential restructuring to ensure equitable distribution of benefits among all marginalized groups. This event could significantly impact social justice initiatives and political discourse related to tribal rights in India.