Thu Jan 15 08:44:23 UTC 2026: # Supreme Court Reserves Judgment on Plea to Withdraw Life Support for Harish Rana

The Story: The Supreme Court of India has reserved its judgment on a plea by the family of Harish Rana, a 31-year-old man, to withdraw life-sustaining treatment. The case involves a man who has been in a permanent vegetative state since 2013 after suffering severe head injuries. During the hearing, the court considered arguments from both the Union government and the family’s advocate, focusing on the complexities of making such a decision and ensuring a consistent, well-considered approach.

Key Points:

  • The Supreme Court heard a plea to withdraw life-sustaining treatment for Harish Rana, who has been in a persistent vegetative state for 13 years.
  • Justices J.B. Pardiwala and K.V. Viswanathan presided over the hearing.
  • The court considered submissions from Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati for the Union government and advocate Rashmi Nandakumar for the family.
  • The court emphasized the importance of a “consistent and well-considered” decision by the family.
  • The family, after meeting with the Bench, expressed their desire to end Mr. Rana’s suffering.
  • Medical boards reportedly agreed that treatment should be discontinued, allowing “nature to take its own course.”
  • Mr. Rana sustained injuries in 2013 after falling from the fourth floor of his accommodation.
  • The advocate for the family requested the court to avoid using the term “passive euthanasia”.

Key Takeaways:

  • The case highlights the complex ethical and legal considerations surrounding end-of-life decisions in India.
  • The Supreme Court is carefully considering the emotional and practical implications for families facing similar situations.
  • The focus on a “consistent and well-considered” decision emphasizes the need for thorough evaluation and consensus.
  • The medical community’s opinion regarding the futility of further treatment plays a crucial role in the court’s deliberation.
  • The request to avoid “passive euthanasia” terminology indicates a sensitivity towards the evolving language and understanding of end-of-life care.

    Read More

Related News: