Thu Jan 15 08:26:11 UTC 2026: Headline: Justice Department Investigates Five Legislators Over Video Urging Military to Disobey Illegal Orders

The Story:
Five U.S. legislators, all Democrats with prior military or intelligence service, have stated that the Department of Justice is investigating them following the release of a video in November. The video urged members of the U.S. military and intelligence agencies to refuse to follow orders deemed illegal or unconstitutional. This action has ignited a controversy, with former President Donald Trump accusing the legislators of sedition and the FBI launching an inquiry shortly after the video’s release.

The investigation also targets Senator Mark Kelly, who appeared in the same video. Kelly has faced significant backlash from the Defense Department, including potential demotion and reduced retirement pay, leading him to file a lawsuit alleging a violation of his First Amendment rights. The legislators claim that the investigation is a politically motivated attack on their freedom of speech.

Key Points:

  • Five legislators (Senator Elissa Slotkin, Representatives Jason Crow, Maggie Goodlander, Chrissy Houlahan, and Chris Deluzio) are under Justice Department investigation for a video released in November.
  • The video urged military and intelligence personnel to refuse illegal orders, citing concerns about the Trump administration.
  • President Trump labeled the legislators’ actions as “seditious.”
  • Senator Mark Kelly is also under investigation and is facing actions from the Defense Department, including potential demotion.
  • Legislators claim the investigation is a politically motivated attack on free speech.
  • Legal experts and Latin American governments criticized airstrikes ordered by Trump as extrajudicial killings.
  • The Supreme Court previously blocked Trump’s deployment of the National Guard in Illinois, setting a legal precedent.

Key Takeaways:

  • The investigation raises critical questions about the limits of free speech for legislators and the role of the Justice Department under a politically charged administration.
  • The events highlight growing concerns about the politicization of the military and the potential for the erosion of democratic norms.
  • The legal challenges and investigations could set significant precedents regarding the rights and responsibilities of elected officials.
  • The situation underscores the deep divisions within the U.S. regarding the powers of the presidency and the interpretation of constitutional principles.

Impact Analysis:

  • The investigation could have a chilling effect on legislators’ willingness to voice dissent against executive actions, potentially limiting their ability to hold the government accountable.
  • The legal battles surrounding this case will likely shape the interpretation of free speech rights, particularly for individuals with prior military service or in positions of public trust.
  • The ongoing controversy could further erode public trust in government institutions, fueling partisan division and undermining democratic processes.
  • The outcome of the investigations and legal challenges will likely influence the future relationship between the executive and legislative branches, particularly concerning military deployments and executive orders.

    Read More

Related News: