Mon Jan 12 19:33:58 UTC 2026: ### Gig Workers Union Appeals to Human Rights Commission Over “Forced Labour” Practices

The Story:
The Gig and Platform Service Workers Union has formally petitioned the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) regarding what they describe as “forced labour” practices within the gig economy. In a letter submitted on Monday, January 12, 2026, the union argues that target-based and time-bound work imposed by platform companies constitutes a violation of Article 23 of the Constitution, International Labour Organisation (ILO) Conventions, and Sustainable Development Goals. The appeal comes shortly after a pan-India strike on December 25 and 31, 2025, protesting against ten-minute delivery services.

The union contends that algorithmic management systems enforce economic coercion through rigid time targets, opaque performance metrics, and the threat of penalties, effectively removing genuine choice for workers dependent on platform income. They argue that this represents a new, technologically mediated form of forced labour, where control is exercised via algorithms, ratings, and punitive incentive structures.

Key Points:

  • The Gig and Platform Service Workers Union wrote to the NHRC on January 12, 2026.
  • The letter alleges that platform companies are engaging in “forced labour” through “target-based” and “time-bound work.”
  • The union cites Article 23 of the Constitution, ILO Conventions, and Sustainable Development Goals.
  • The letter references a recent pan-India strike against ten-minute deliveries held on December 25 and 31.
  • The union argues that algorithmic management systems create economic coercion and eliminate genuine worker choice.

Critical Analysis:
The petition to the NHRC signals an escalation in the gig workers’ fight for improved labor conditions. The timing of the letter, following the strike against ten-minute deliveries, suggests a coordinated strategy to leverage public awareness and increase pressure on platform companies and regulatory bodies. The mention of the Supreme Court’s position on forced labor indicates the union’s legal preparation.

Key Takeaways:

  • Gig workers are increasingly organizing and actively challenging the prevailing labor practices of platform companies.
  • The focus on “forced labour” aims to frame the issue as a fundamental human rights violation.
  • The legal and constitutional arguments suggest a sophisticated and well-prepared union strategy.
  • Algorithmic management is being scrutinized as a new form of control over workers.
  • The NHRC’s response will be a crucial indicator of the future regulation of the gig economy.

Impact Analysis:
This appeal to the NHRC could have significant long-term implications for the gig economy in India. If the NHRC takes cognisance of the union’s concerns, it could lead to investigations into platform companies’ labor practices and potentially result in recommendations for policy changes. This could include stricter regulations on working hours, compensation, and algorithmic management, ultimately reshaping the relationship between gig workers and platform companies. Furthermore, a favorable outcome for the union could embolden gig workers in other sectors and countries to challenge similar practices.

Read More

Related News: