Wed Jan 07 02:10:00 UTC 2026: ### Trump’s Venezuela Intervention Sparks Outrage and Accusations of Oil Grab

The Story:
President Donald Trump is facing intense criticism after authorizing the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and asserting that the United States will now “run” Venezuela. Democratic Senator Adam Schiff, a frequent target of Trump’s attacks, has accused the president of betraying his “MAGA” base by engaging in foreign intervention, a direct contradiction of campaign promises. Schiff alleges that Trump’s actions are motivated by the desire to exploit Venezuela’s vast oil reserves for the benefit of American oil companies, who he claims heavily funded Trump’s campaign.

Key Points:

  • President Trump ordered the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro.
  • Senator Adam Schiff accuses Trump of betraying his promise of “no more foreign wars, no more nation-building”.
  • Schiff alleges the intervention is driven by a desire to seize Venezuelan oil for U.S. oil companies.
  • Trump stated the U.S. will now “run” Venezuela and seize control of its oil industry.
  • Trump admitted to discussing the oil seizure with U.S. oil firms ahead of time, highlighting the decrepit state of Venezuelan oil infrastructure.

Critical Analysis:
The historical context provided reveals a potential pattern of behavior within the Trump administration: prioritizing business interests and potentially misleading his base. The prior news item “MAGA Official’s Family Busted Cashing in on Government Deals” points to potential corruption within Trump’s circle. Combined with the current accusations from Schiff regarding the oil industry, a picture emerges of Trump being influenced by financial incentives, even if it goes against campaign promises. Moreover, the article “After Venezuela, Here Are Trump’s 5 Next Potential Targets” suggests a calculated strategy of foreign intervention.

Key Takeaways:

  • President Trump’s intervention in Venezuela contradicts his previous promises of non-interventionist foreign policy.
  • Accusations of prioritizing the oil industry over national interests raise concerns about corruption and influence peddling.
  • The situation creates a significant political backlash, alienating some of his base and emboldening his political opponents.
  • Trump’s actions could destabilize the region and further strain international relations.
  • The focus on seizing Venezuelan oil raises legal and ethical questions about the legitimacy of the intervention.

Impact Analysis:

The long-term significance and future impact of this event series are substantial.

  1. Geopolitical Instability: The U.S. intervention in Venezuela could trigger a protracted internal conflict and destabilize the region, potentially leading to a humanitarian crisis and refugee flows.
  2. International Relations: Trump’s actions are likely to be condemned by the international community, further isolating the United States and damaging its credibility on the world stage.
  3. Economic Consequences: The seizure and management of Venezuelan oil assets by U.S. companies will be subject to legal challenges and may result in international sanctions. The intervention could also disrupt global oil markets and affect prices.
  4. Domestic Political Fallout: The controversy surrounding the intervention will likely intensify political divisions within the United States, leading to increased scrutiny of Trump’s administration and potential impeachment proceedings.
  5. Erosion of Trust: The alleged betrayal of campaign promises and the perception of corruption will further erode public trust in government and fuel cynicism about the political process.

    Read More