Tue Jan 06 04:00:00 UTC 2026: ### Headline: CPI(M) Condemns India’s Response to U.S. Intervention in Venezuela

The Story

On Monday, January 5, 2026, the Communist Party of India (Marxist) (CPI(M)) publicly criticized the Indian government’s reaction to the U.S. military operation that resulted in the removal of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro. The CPI(M) deemed India’s response, which expressed “deep concern” and called for dialogue, as “craven” and “unworthy” of India’s tradition of defending national sovereignty. The party highlighted the absence of any condemnation of the U.S. action’s violation of the UN Charter and international law.

The CPI(M) contrasted India’s stance with that of its BRICS partners, Brazil and South Africa, which unequivocally condemned the U.S. aggression and demanded the release of Maduro and his wife. They accused the Modi-led BJP government of aligning with the U.S. due to its right-wing ideology and strategic ties with the Trump administration, thereby abdicating India’s claim to represent the interests of the Global South.

Key Points

  • The CPI(M) condemned India’s response to the U.S. military operation in Venezuela.
  • India’s statement expressed “deep concern” and called for dialogue, but did not condemn the U.S. action.
  • The CPI(M) contrasted India’s stance with that of Brazil and South Africa, who strongly condemned the U.S.
  • The party accused the Modi government of aligning with the U.S. due to its ideology and strategic ties.
  • The U.S. brought Nicolas Maduro and his wife to New York to face drug trafficking charges.

Critical Analysis

The historical context provided reveals some interesting connections. The article “[Tue Jan 06 04:00:00 UTC 2026] Venezuela crisis fueling Indian oil stocks! RIL hits 52-week high; ONGC up 1% — Here’s why” suggests that the Venezuelan crisis and the change in leadership could be positively affecting Indian oil stocks. The Modi government’s less-than-condemnatory stance, therefore, might be influenced by economic considerations and potential benefits for Indian companies from a U.S.-backed regime in Venezuela. Further, the article “[Tue Jan 06 04:38:30 UTC 2026] ‘Indian Envoy Urged Trump To Relieve Tariffs’: US Senator’s Big Claim” suggests an ongoing behind-the-scenes negotiation or alignment between India and the U.S., which could explain India’s reluctance to strongly condemn the U.S. action in Venezuela.

Key Takeaways

  • The CPI(M)’s criticism highlights a significant ideological divide within India regarding foreign policy.
  • India’s response to the Venezuelan crisis may be influenced by strategic and economic considerations related to its relationship with the U.S. and the potential benefits for its oil sector.
  • The event underscores the complex interplay between domestic politics, international relations, and economic interests in shaping a nation’s foreign policy stance.
  • India’s BRICS partners, Brazil and South Africa, represent a different perspective within the Global South regarding the U.S. intervention.
  • This situation poses a challenge to India’s claim of representing the interests of the Global South.

Impact Analysis

This event series has potentially long-term implications for India’s foreign policy and its standing in the international community.

  • BRICS Relations: The divergent stances on the Venezuelan crisis could strain relations within the BRICS alliance, potentially weakening the group’s cohesion and influence.
  • Global South Leadership: India’s perceived alignment with the U.S. may erode its credibility as a leader of the Global South, opening opportunities for other nations to assume that role.
  • Domestic Political Fallout: The CPI(M)’s strong criticism could resonate with segments of the Indian population that are critical of the Modi government’s pro-U.S. foreign policy, leading to increased domestic political polarization.
  • U.S.-India Relations: While the incident is unlikely to fundamentally alter U.S.-India relations, it could prompt a reevaluation of the terms of engagement and the extent to which India is willing to align with U.S. foreign policy objectives.
  • Venezuelan Relations: The future relationship between Venezuela and India will likely depend on the stability of the new leadership and any potential benefits that can accrue from a U.S.-backed regime.

    Read More

Related News: