Sun Jan 04 13:18:48 UTC 2026: Summary:
The article discusses President Trump’s recent military intervention in Venezuela, where US forces seized President Nicolas Maduro. It draws parallels to past US regime change efforts in Afghanistan and Iraq, highlighting the potential for long-term instability and unintended consequences. While Trump touts the operation as a success, it contradicts his previous anti-war rhetoric and raises concerns about repeating historical mistakes. The article emphasizes the US’s history of foreign-imposed regime change, its often-destabilizing effects, and the potential for a similar outcome in Venezuela.
News Article:
US Forces Seize Venezuelan President Maduro in Bold Military Operation
Caracas, Venezuela – In a stunning turn of events, US military forces have successfully apprehended Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro in an operation celebrated by President Donald Trump as “flawless.” Details remain scarce, but US officials confirmed a coordinated assault involving special forces, air strikes, and naval deployments, resulting in Maduro’s capture and removal from power.
The operation marks a significant escalation in US policy towards Venezuela, where the Trump administration has long sought Maduro’s ouster. However, the move has sparked immediate controversy, drawing comparisons to past US-led regime change interventions in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Critics point to the potential for long-term instability, civil conflict, and the rise of extremist groups, citing the troubled aftermaths of previous US interventions. The article also highlights the irony of Trump, who previously campaigned on an anti-war platform, now ordering a large-scale military intervention.
The US has a long history of foreign-imposed regime change, with some scholars estimating that it accounts for nearly a third of all such interventions globally. Some say this has had unintended consequences. The Trump administration has justified its actions by portraying Maduro as a criminal, but the endgame remains unclear.