Wed Dec 31 10:20:00 UTC 2025: Here’s a summary of the text and a news article based on it:

Summary:

Russia is accusing Ukraine of launching a drone attack on a presidential residence, claiming it was intended to disrupt peace talks. Ukraine denies the allegations, calling them a pretext for Russia to escalate the war. Russia has presented no clear evidence, and the timing coincides with a recent positive meeting between Presidents Trump and Zelenskyy, raising suspicions that the accusation is a strategic move to influence US policy. Notably, Trump himself has stated that Putin directly told him about the drones, and Trump seemed sympathetic to the Russian narrative. Ukraine seeks stronger security guarantees from the US, but Trump’s response and past failures of security agreements raise concerns about the reliability of such guarantees. The timing also coincides with the fact that Trump offered Ukraine security guarantees for at least 15 years, while Kyiv was asking for as much as 50 years.

News Article:

Russia Accuses Ukraine of Drone Attack, Threatens Retaliation; Kyiv Denies Allegations as ‘Baseless Lie’

Moscow, Russia – Tensions between Russia and Ukraine have escalated sharply as Moscow accused Kyiv of launching a drone attack on a presidential residence, alleging it was a deliberate attempt to sabotage potential peace negotiations. Russian officials have vehemently condemned the purported attack and hinted at a forceful response, with one official stating, “There can be no forgiveness.”

Ukraine has dismissed the accusations as a fabrication designed to create a pretext for Russia to intensify its ongoing military operations. “Almost a day passed and Russia still hasn’t provided any plausible evidence,” said Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha. “And they won’t. Because there’s none. No such attack happened.”

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov claimed that dozens of drones were intercepted targeting a presidential residence, contradicting initial reports from the defense ministry regarding the locations and numbers of intercepted drones. The Kremlin has declined to provide concrete evidence of the alleged attack, deferring questions about wreckage to the military.

The timing of the accusations has raised eyebrows, coming shortly after a seemingly productive meeting between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and former U.S. President Donald Trump. Some analysts suggest Russia is attempting to influence U.S. policy by creating a narrative that casts Ukraine as an aggressor.

Trump himself has said that Putin directly told him about the drones, and Trump seemed sympathetic to the Russian narrative, adding fuel to concerns about the effectiveness of any security guarantees Ukraine might receive from the US.
“I don’t like it,” Trump told reporters when asked if he was worried the alleged attack could affect his efforts to broker peace.

Zelenskyy has sought long-term, legally binding security guarantees from the U.S., seeking assurances against future Russian aggression. However, experts emphasize that past agreements, such as the 1994 Budapest Memorandum, failed to prevent the current conflict, raising questions about the reliability of such assurances.

“We need something more than a neatly written piece of paper,” said Sviatoslav Yurash, a member of Ukraine’s Parliament.

The accusations and counter-accusations further complicate an already volatile situation, raising concerns about the prospects for de-escalation and a peaceful resolution to the conflict.

Read More