Mon Dec 29 07:30:00 UTC 2025: Okay, here’s a summary and a news article based on the provided text:

Summary:

The Supreme Court of India has stayed a Delhi High Court decision that would have potentially granted relief to Kuldeep Sengar, who was convicted in the Unnao rape case. The Supreme Court deemed the charges against Sengar as serious and stated he should not be granted bail in any case. The court has issued a notice to Sengar’s lawyer, requiring them to respond in two weeks. The next hearing is scheduled in four weeks. The Supreme Court emphasized that Sengar will not be released and that the victim has the right to file a separate Special Leave Petition (SLP) without requiring special permission. The court also addressed concerns about the safety of the victim’s family and condemned attempts to intimidate the judiciary, sparked by the online circulation of pictures of the High Court judges who decided to grant him relief.

News Article:

Supreme Court Halts Relief for Convicted Unnao Rapist Kuldeep Sengar

New Delhi: The Supreme Court of India has delivered a significant blow to Kuldeep Sengar, the former legislator convicted in the Unnao rape case, by staying a recent Delhi High Court decision that could have potentially offered him relief.

“The charges are serious, and this criminal should not receive bail in any instance,” stated the Chief Justice of India (CJI) Justice Suryakant, who led the bench. The court issued a notice to Sengar’s legal counsel, demanding a response within two weeks. The next hearing is scheduled for four weeks from now.

The Supreme Court made it clear from the outset that it was inclined to suspend the High Court’s order, focusing the debate solely on the issue of the stay. The court acknowledged the “strange” situation given that Sengar is currently incarcerated in another case but stressed that this order will remain in effect.

The court also affirmed the victim’s right to file a separate SLP without needing special permission. The victim’s lawyer raised concerns about the ongoing threat to the victim’s family. The CJI assured them that legal remedies were available and that the Court was aware of those risks.

The Supreme Court also addressed troubling reports of online campaigns targeting the Delhi High Court judges involved in the initial decision. Pictures of the judges were being circulated with negative commentary. The CJI condemned these actions, stating, “We know people are trying to take political advantage…Do not try to intimidate the system. These matters should be debated within the court, not on the streets.”
The next hearing will be held next month.

Read More