Mon Dec 29 14:46:25 UTC 2025: Summary:
This article details how, in the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump has been aggressively using emergency powers and broad interpretations of executive authority to enact his policy agenda. These actions include addressing immigration, trade, and drug trafficking. Legal observers and experts have expressed concerns about the expansion and potential abuse of presidential power, especially given the lack of clear inciting events and the absence of congressional or judicial checks on the President’s authority. While lower courts have pushed back in some instances, the Supreme Court’s stance remains uncertain. The midterm elections next year could be a key test of the public’s approval of Trump’s actions.
News Article:
Trump’s Second Term Marked by Unprecedented Use of Emergency Powers
Washington, D.C. – President Donald Trump’s first year of his second term has been characterized by a series of sweeping policy changes justified by the invocation of emergency powers, raising concerns about the scope of executive authority. From immigration and trade to combating drug trafficking, the President has declared numerous emergencies to circumvent traditional legislative processes.
Critics argue that Trump is stretching the definition of “emergency” to an unprecedented degree, using it to justify policies that would otherwise face legal or political challenges. Actions include declaring an “invasion” at the southern border, imposing tariffs under national security grounds, and authorizing military action against alleged “narcoterrorists” in Latin America.
Legal experts point out that while the US Constitution lacks a specific emergency power clause, Congress has granted presidents limited emergency powers. However, Trump’s critics say he is using these powers in ways not intended by the statutes, effectively rewriting laws through executive action.
“I’ve never seen a president invoke emergency powers to justify practically all of his policy agenda,” said Professor David Driesen of Syracuse University College of Law.
The lack of pushback from the Republican-controlled Congress has amplified concerns. While lower courts have challenged some of the President’s actions, the Supreme Court’s ultimate stance remains unclear. The upcoming midterm elections in 2026 could serve as a referendum on Trump’s expansive use of presidential power and determine the future balance of power in Washington.
First Piper 