Wed Dec 24 06:20:00 UTC 2025: Here’s a summary and a news article rewrite based on the provided text:
Summary:
The Supreme Court rejected the Trump administration’s request to deploy National Guard troops in Illinois to assist federal agents in immigration enforcement. The court found the administration failed to demonstrate the necessary legal authority to do so, particularly citing limitations imposed by the Posse Comitatus Act. This decision, while preliminary, sets a precedent that could hinder similar deployments in other cities. The ruling was a split decision with conservative justices divided. Opponents of the deployment, including Illinois Governor Pritzker, hailed it as a check on executive power.
News Article:
Supreme Court Blocks Trump’s National Guard Deployment in Illinois
Washington D.C. – In a setback for the Trump administration, the Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected a request to deploy National Guard troops to Illinois, effectively halting the president’s plan to use the military to assist federal agents with immigration enforcement in the Chicago area.
The unsigned order from the court rebuffed the administration’s assertion that the deployment was necessary to protect federal personnel amidst escalating tensions. The decision is likely to impact similar legal challenges to deployments in other Democratic-led cities.
The Court’s ruling centered on whether the circumstances in Chicago met the legal threshold for invoking federal law to call up the National Guard, specifically the inability of regular federal forces to maintain order. The court found that the administration had not proven this requirement, citing the Posse Comitatus Act, which generally restricts the military from engaging in domestic law enforcement.
Illinois Governor JB Pritzker, a vocal critic of the deployment, celebrated the decision. “This is an important step in curbing the Trump Administration’s consistent abuse of power and slowing Trump’s march toward authoritarianism,” he said in a statement.
White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson defended the President’s actions, stating that the deployment was intended to protect federal law enforcement and property. “Nothing in today’s ruling detracts from that core agenda,” she said. “The Administration will continue working day in and day out to safeguard the American public.”
The court’s decision revealed a split among the conservative justices, with Justices Alito, Thomas, and Gorsuch dissenting. Alito argued that the President’s assessment that civilian law enforcement was insufficient should have been respected.
This ruling is the latest development in Trump’s efforts to assert federal control over cities that have openly opposed his policies, including similar attempts to deploy the National Guard in Washington D.C., Los Angeles, and Portland.
First Piper 