Tue Dec 23 18:25:08 UTC 2025: Summary:
The Israeli government is facing criticism for its recent actions targeting media outlets, including the ban on Al Jazeera and moves to shut down Army Radio and privatize the public broadcaster Kan. Critics argue these actions stifle dissenting voices, undermine democracy, and grant the government unprecedented control over the media narrative. The government defends these measures as necessary for national security and combating perceived bias. Concerns have been raised by international organizations, the Israeli Attorney General, and journalists who believe these moves threaten press freedom and the public’s right to know.
News Article:
Israel Accused of Silencing Critics with Media Crackdown
Jerusalem – The Israeli government is under fire for a series of measures targeting media outlets, sparking accusations of stifling dissenting voices and undermining press freedom.
Recent moves include the extension of the so-called “Al Jazeera Law,” which allows the government to shut down foreign media outlets deemed a national security threat. The law was used earlier this year to ban Al Jazeera from operating in Israel. Critics argue the law is a tool to silence critical reporting on the government’s actions, particularly regarding its military operations in Gaza.
In addition, the government is moving to shut down Army Radio, a publicly funded news outlet often critical of government policies. Defence Minister Israel Katz claims the station has become a platform to attack the Israeli military.
Further stoking controversy is a plan to privatize Kan, Israel’s public broadcaster, and a bill that would place media regulators under direct government control. Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara has condemned the moves, stating they threaten press freedom and could weaken public broadcasting.
International organizations, including the International Federation of Journalists, have voiced strong concerns. IFJ General Secretary Anthony Bellanger called the actions “typical behaviour of authoritarian regimes.”
The government defends the measures, citing national security concerns and accusing the media of bias. Communications Minister Shlomo Karhi has even blamed the media for contributing to the security failures that led to the October 7th attacks.
Critics argue that the Israeli media already largely supports the government’s narrative, with limited coverage of Palestinian suffering. These new measures, they contend, will further tighten the government’s grip on information and limit the public’s access to diverse perspectives.
First Piper 