Wed Dec 17 03:00:00 UTC 2025: Okay, here’s a summary and a news article based on the provided text:
Summary:
The text presents an analysis of a proposed new NHL points system aimed at rewarding teams for winning, even in overtime or shootouts. It contrasts the current system with a specific proposal (“System That Rewards You Based on How Well You Play”) which awards 3 points for a regulation win, 2 for an overtime win, 1 for a shootout win, and 0 for a loss. It then compares this system to a simple “2 points for any win, 0 for any loss” system. It analyzes the potential impact on team standings and playoff qualification for the 2024-2026 seasons based on actual results under both systems. The author also states he will add two more systems in the future.
News Article:
NHL Analyst Proposes Radical Point System Overhaul to Prioritize Wins
December 14, 2025 (HockeyBuzz.com) – A new debate is brewing within the NHL community after an analyst on HockeyBuzz.com unveiled a series of proposed point systems designed to prioritize winning and potentially reshape playoff qualification.
The analyst criticized the current system, emphasizing the need to reward teams that actively pursue victories. “When you think about it, it’s ridiculous I have to even say that when this is a sport we’re talking about… But here we are,” the author stated.
The initial proposal, termed “The System That Rewards You Based on How Well You Play,” would award 3 points for a regulation win, 2 for an overtime win, 1 for a shootout win, and 0 for a loss. The analysis then provides projections based on the actual 2024-2026 regular season results. A second system of awarding 2 points for any win, and 0 points for a loss, was also analyzed.
The analyst presented detailed tables comparing the impact of the current and proposed point systems on team standings across all four divisions, highlighting potential shifts in playoff berths.
The analysis highlights potential changes in playoff teams, with some teams currently out of contention potentially qualifying under the new system, and vice-versa. Specific teams are not mentioned in the article due to the nature of the text provided.
The analyst concluded by stating that two additional point systems will be introduced for further analysis, inviting feedback and promising to “analyze and fix this” in future posts. The proposals have already sparked lively discussion among fans and analysts alike, with many debating the potential benefits and drawbacks of such a significant change to the NHL’s competitive landscape.
First Piper 