Tue Dec 02 10:20:00 UTC 2025: Okay, here’s a summary and a news article based on the provided text:
Summary:
A University of Oklahoma psychology student, Samantha Fulnecky, is protesting a failing grade she received on an essay where she cited the Bible to argue against the elimination of traditional gender roles. She believes her free speech rights were violated, alleging discrimination based on her religious beliefs. The instructor cited a lack of empirical evidence and deemed parts of the essay offensive. The university has placed the graduate instructor on administrative leave and is reviewing the situation. The Oklahoman newspaper has published the essay and related communication, soliciting public opinions on the grading decision.
News Article:
OU Instructor on Leave After Student Alleges Grade Discrimination Based on Religious Views
Norman, OK – The University of Oklahoma (OU) has placed a graduate instructor on administrative leave after a psychology student, Samantha Fulnecky, claimed her failing grade on an essay was a violation of her free speech rights. Fulnecky, a junior, argues that she was penalized for citing the Bible in her essay, which addressed societal perceptions of gender based on an assigned article.
In the essay, Fulnecky argued against eliminating traditional gender roles, stating they align with what she believes is God’s plan for humanity. The instructor awarded her zero points out of a possible 25, citing a lack of empirical evidence and describing parts of the essay as offensive.
Fulnecky contends the assignment did not explicitly require empirical evidence and believes her citation of the Bible was the primary reason for the failing grade. She argues that OU policy protects free speech, even if some may find it offensive.
“To be, what I think is clearly discriminated against for my beliefs and using freedom of speech, and especially for my religious beliefs, I think that’s just absurd,” Fulnecky told The Oklahoman.
OU officials have not released further details regarding the administrative leave. The Oklahoman has published Fulnecky’s essay and related communications, including the assignment’s criteria, with instructor names redacted. The newspaper is soliciting public opinion on the grading decision, inviting readers to submit their own assessments of the essay.
The controversy raises questions about academic freedom, grading criteria, and the role of religious viewpoints in academic assignments. The university is expected to conduct a review of the situation.
First Piper 