Fri Nov 07 06:59:19 UTC 2025: Here’s a summary and a rewritten news article based on the provided text:
Summary:
The Supreme Court of India is hearing a petition seeking a judicially monitored probe into the Air India Boeing 787 Dreamliner crash that occurred on June 12 in Ahmedabad. The petition was filed by the father of the pilot, who believes the official investigation is flawed and unfairly blames his son. The court has expressed that the pilot is not being blamed, and is awaiting responses from the Centre and the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) regarding the request for an independent investigation. The petition highlights alleged defects in the official investigation, including the misinterpretation of technical evidence and the failure to properly examine the flight data recorder.
News Article:
Supreme Court Hears Plea for Independent Probe into Air India Crash, Defends Pilot
New Delhi, November 7, 2025 – The Supreme Court of India today heard a petition seeking a judicially monitored investigation into the Air India Boeing 787 Dreamliner crash that occurred on June 12 in Ahmedabad. The crash, which shook the aviation industry, has been subject to ongoing scrutiny regarding its cause.
The petition, filed by Pushkar Raj Sabharwal, the father of the late Captain Sumeet Sabharwal, alleges that the official investigation conducted by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) and the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) is “defective” and overlooks crucial technical evidence.
During the hearing, Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi reassured the petitioner that his son was not being blamed for the accident. “This crash is extremely unfortunate, but you should not carry the burden that your son is being blamed. Nobody can blame him for anything,” Justice Kant stated. Justice Bagchi echoed this sentiment, noting that the preliminary AAIB report contained no adverse remarks against the pilot.
The court dismissed reports from foreign media outlets that attributed the crash to pilot error, stating that such reports carry no weight in the Indian legal proceedings.
The petition highlighted the activation of the aircraft’s Ram Air Turbine (RAT) before any control inputs were made by the pilots, suggesting a possible electrical or software malfunction. It also criticized the handling of the flight data recorder.
The Supreme Court has issued notices to the Centre and the DGCA, seeking their responses to the request for an independent probe. The case will be heard along with a pending petition filed by the NGO Safety Matters on November 10. This latest development underscores the ongoing concerns surrounding the integrity and thoroughness of the crash investigation.